RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track

Post anything about MX Simulator here. Please. I'm begging you.

RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGr Anaheim SX Track

RF's Anaheim SX track
136
88%
EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track
19
12%
 
Total votes: 155

Finalmushroom
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:43 pm
Team: Privateer
Location: Pacific North West

RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track

Postby Finalmushroom » Tue Jan 08, 2019 9:26 pm

Like the title suggests which do you prefer?
Its really interesting seeing different tracks and how different creators (I'm assuming here) as well as teams create different tracks.

I like the MxGR track more myself as it's a bit more spread out which helps me get my double in's cleaner (I also think this gives more options for lines as you can double in fairly easily and still build into bigger lines and not just triple in like the Rf tracks seems to be made for) and has more space coming into and out of corners. The Rf track seems like they space it out to utilize all of the straight space (A good example is where they placed the three whoops under the bridge, they literally run right into the corner which is interesting). It's pretty tight but is more technical!
Curious what you dudes/gals think! :mrgreen:

-Jake

Finalmushroom
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:43 pm
Team: Privateer
Location: Pacific North West

Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track

Postby Finalmushroom » Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:04 pm

Does anyone have any reasoning for your responses? I'm really curious!

User avatar
nickuzick
Posts: 3073
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:42 pm
Location: British Columbia
Contact:

Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track

Postby nickuzick » Wed Jan 09, 2019 8:05 pm

Finalmushroom wrote:Does anyone have any reasoning for your responses? I'm really curious!

Bro
Image

User avatar
Jakob Hubbard
Posts: 715
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2017 3:16 am
Team: Minecraft Motorsport
Location: Cold

Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track

Postby Jakob Hubbard » Wed Jan 09, 2019 9:36 pm

Finalmushroom wrote:Does anyone have any reasoning for your responses? I'm really curious!

It's not even a competition because rF is annihilating the EMF tracks.
Image

User avatar
ColtHans
Posts: 790
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 10:36 pm
Team: no u

Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track

Postby ColtHans » Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:09 pm

Jakob Hubbard wrote:
Finalmushroom wrote:Does anyone have any reasoning for your responses? I'm really curious!

It's not even a competition because rF is annihilating the EMF tracks.

what's a emf again?
PM ME FOR CHEAP SKINS
Image

Finalmushroom
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:43 pm
Team: Privateer
Location: Pacific North West

Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track

Postby Finalmushroom » Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:15 pm

Jakob Hubbard wrote:
Finalmushroom wrote:Does anyone have any reasoning for your responses? I'm really curious!

It's not even a competition because rF is annihilating the EMF tracks.


Care to expand why? Non bias please as you all seem to be fan boys around here.

Finalmushroom
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:43 pm
Team: Privateer
Location: Pacific North West

Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track

Postby Finalmushroom » Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:15 pm

ColtHans wrote:
Jakob Hubbard wrote:
Finalmushroom wrote:Does anyone have any reasoning for your responses? I'm really curious!

It's not even a competition because rF is annihilating the EMF tracks.

what's a emf again?


Non relevant. I stated the track not who created it. Thanks.

Finalmushroom
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:43 pm
Team: Privateer
Location: Pacific North West

Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track

Postby Finalmushroom » Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:16 pm

nickuzick wrote:
Finalmushroom wrote:Does anyone have any reasoning for your responses? I'm really curious!

Bro


Yeah! Use words sir. Care to expand?

User avatar
dawsonsleeper
Posts: 870
Joined: Fri May 12, 2017 2:23 am
Location: Alaska
Contact:

Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track

Postby dawsonsleeper » Wed Jan 09, 2019 10:56 pm

i think the rF track is a lot more better built. the scaling is much much better, it erodes really good. the sections can be technical or you can go slow through them, i think its a good track for people who are pros and ams who are not as good.
jlv wrote:WTF I love Trump now! Make America great again!

User avatar
checkerz
Posts: 8835
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:23 am
Team: RaGe Factory

Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track

Postby checkerz » Wed Jan 09, 2019 11:08 pm

Image

Image

Image

Image

User avatar
nickuzick
Posts: 3073
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 9:42 pm
Location: British Columbia
Contact:

Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track

Postby nickuzick » Wed Jan 09, 2019 11:14 pm

Finalmushroom wrote:
nickuzick wrote:
Finalmushroom wrote:Does anyone have any reasoning for your responses? I'm really curious!

Bro


Yeah! Use words sir. Care to expand?

Lets put it this way, the 6 people who voted EMF either work on the tracks or with EMF.
Image

WellsMX524
Posts: 1916
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 7:23 am
Team: MV Films
Location: Illinois

Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track

Postby WellsMX524 » Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:24 am

Fair analysis:

EMF tracks look like they're from 2010. Track makers can't make jump transitions. Tracks feel like they're a mile wide, jumps look really bad and not smooth. EMF, if they want to actually get a ROI this year need to start focusing on making the GP series. I gave A1 a fair shake, and it looked really bad visually, and doesn't even compare to RF tracks. Erode is the future, not running it is trying to stay in the past and not progress the game.

reddead422
Posts: 280
Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 12:54 am
Team: Wildside Designs

Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track

Postby reddead422 » Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:25 am

Why isn't jgmx A1 an option we need to include all options next time guys cmon :evil:

i still would vote for rf sorry JG <3

Finalmushroom
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:43 pm
Team: Privateer
Location: Pacific North West

Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track

Postby Finalmushroom » Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:40 am

WellsMX524 wrote:Fair analysis:

EMF tracks look like they're from 2010. Track makers can't make jump transitions. Tracks feel like they're a mile wide, jumps look really bad and not smooth. EMF, if they want to actually get a ROI this year need to start focusing on making the GP series. I gave A1 a fair shake, and it looked really bad visually, and doesn't even compare to RF tracks. Erode is the future, not running it is trying to stay in the past and not progress the game.


I personally felt that the new EMF track looked better than the new RF one. I think it was the dirt and the lack of those beaming stadium lights. I understand why Rf runs them but as far as looks go I liked the EMF one.

I agree with you about erode though. After I posted this I realized that I didn't have my erode on (I just had downloaded the new snapshot) and really enjoy the Rf track with erode. Erode is a really fun aspect to this game which I really enjoy!

Thanks for the good points though!

Finalmushroom
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:43 pm
Team: Privateer
Location: Pacific North West

Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track

Postby Finalmushroom » Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:41 am

reddead422 wrote:Why isn't jgmx A1 an option we need to include all options next time guys cmon :evil:

i still would vote for rf sorry JG <3


I saw it in the forums and honestly haven't tried it. I love JG's tracks and probably would like it the most. But I find that the Rf tracks challenge me the most which is frustrating but I get more enjoyment once I get them figured out. Kind of weird.


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests