RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track
-
- Posts: 515
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:43 pm
- Team: Privateer
- Location: Pacific North West
RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track
Like the title suggests which do you prefer?
Its really interesting seeing different tracks and how different creators (I'm assuming here) as well as teams create different tracks.
I like the MxGR track more myself as it's a bit more spread out which helps me get my double in's cleaner (I also think this gives more options for lines as you can double in fairly easily and still build into bigger lines and not just triple in like the Rf tracks seems to be made for) and has more space coming into and out of corners. The Rf track seems like they space it out to utilize all of the straight space (A good example is where they placed the three whoops under the bridge, they literally run right into the corner which is interesting). It's pretty tight but is more technical!
Curious what you dudes/gals think!
-Jake
Its really interesting seeing different tracks and how different creators (I'm assuming here) as well as teams create different tracks.
I like the MxGR track more myself as it's a bit more spread out which helps me get my double in's cleaner (I also think this gives more options for lines as you can double in fairly easily and still build into bigger lines and not just triple in like the Rf tracks seems to be made for) and has more space coming into and out of corners. The Rf track seems like they space it out to utilize all of the straight space (A good example is where they placed the three whoops under the bridge, they literally run right into the corner which is interesting). It's pretty tight but is more technical!
Curious what you dudes/gals think!
-Jake
-
- Posts: 515
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:43 pm
- Team: Privateer
- Location: Pacific North West
Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track
Does anyone have any reasoning for your responses? I'm really curious!
Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track
BroFinalmushroom wrote:Does anyone have any reasoning for your responses? I'm really curious!
-
- Posts: 1152
- Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2017 3:16 am
- Team: Phil's
- Location: Cold
- Contact:
Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track
It's not even a competition because rF is annihilating the EMF tracks.Finalmushroom wrote:Does anyone have any reasoning for your responses? I'm really curious!
Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track
what's a emf again?Jakob Hubbard wrote:It's not even a competition because rF is annihilating the EMF tracks.Finalmushroom wrote:Does anyone have any reasoning for your responses? I'm really curious!
-
- Posts: 515
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:43 pm
- Team: Privateer
- Location: Pacific North West
Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track
Care to expand why? Non bias please as you all seem to be fan boys around here.Jakob Hubbard wrote:It's not even a competition because rF is annihilating the EMF tracks.Finalmushroom wrote:Does anyone have any reasoning for your responses? I'm really curious!
-
- Posts: 515
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:43 pm
- Team: Privateer
- Location: Pacific North West
Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track
Non relevant. I stated the track not who created it. Thanks.ColtHans wrote:what's a emf again?Jakob Hubbard wrote:It's not even a competition because rF is annihilating the EMF tracks.Finalmushroom wrote:Does anyone have any reasoning for your responses? I'm really curious!
-
- Posts: 515
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:43 pm
- Team: Privateer
- Location: Pacific North West
Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track
Yeah! Use words sir. Care to expand?nickuzick wrote:BroFinalmushroom wrote:Does anyone have any reasoning for your responses? I'm really curious!
-
- Posts: 899
- Joined: Fri May 12, 2017 2:23 am
- Location: Alaska
- Contact:
Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track
i think the rF track is a lot more better built. the scaling is much much better, it erodes really good. the sections can be technical or you can go slow through them, i think its a good track for people who are pros and ams who are not as good.
jlv wrote:WTF I love Trump now! Make America great again!
Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track
Lets put it this way, the 6 people who voted EMF either work on the tracks or with EMF.Finalmushroom wrote:Yeah! Use words sir. Care to expand?nickuzick wrote:BroFinalmushroom wrote:Does anyone have any reasoning for your responses? I'm really curious!
-
- Posts: 2106
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 7:23 am
- Team: Aspect Visual Co.
- Location: Illinois/Wisconsin
Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track
Fair analysis:
EMF tracks look like they're from 2010. Track makers can't make jump transitions. Tracks feel like they're a mile wide, jumps look really bad and not smooth. EMF, if they want to actually get a ROI this year need to start focusing on making the GP series. I gave A1 a fair shake, and it looked really bad visually, and doesn't even compare to RF tracks. Erode is the future, not running it is trying to stay in the past and not progress the game.
EMF tracks look like they're from 2010. Track makers can't make jump transitions. Tracks feel like they're a mile wide, jumps look really bad and not smooth. EMF, if they want to actually get a ROI this year need to start focusing on making the GP series. I gave A1 a fair shake, and it looked really bad visually, and doesn't even compare to RF tracks. Erode is the future, not running it is trying to stay in the past and not progress the game.
-
- Posts: 352
- Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2014 12:54 am
- Team: Wildside Designs
Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track
Why isn't jgmx A1 an option we need to include all options next time guys cmon
i still would vote for rf sorry JG <3
i still would vote for rf sorry JG <3
-
- Posts: 515
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:43 pm
- Team: Privateer
- Location: Pacific North West
Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track
I personally felt that the new EMF track looked better than the new RF one. I think it was the dirt and the lack of those beaming stadium lights. I understand why Rf runs them but as far as looks go I liked the EMF one.WellsMX524 wrote:Fair analysis:
EMF tracks look like they're from 2010. Track makers can't make jump transitions. Tracks feel like they're a mile wide, jumps look really bad and not smooth. EMF, if they want to actually get a ROI this year need to start focusing on making the GP series. I gave A1 a fair shake, and it looked really bad visually, and doesn't even compare to RF tracks. Erode is the future, not running it is trying to stay in the past and not progress the game.
I agree with you about erode though. After I posted this I realized that I didn't have my erode on (I just had downloaded the new snapshot) and really enjoy the Rf track with erode. Erode is a really fun aspect to this game which I really enjoy!
Thanks for the good points though!
-
- Posts: 515
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:43 pm
- Team: Privateer
- Location: Pacific North West
Re: RF's Anaheim SX track VS EMF's MxGR Anaheim SX Track
I saw it in the forums and honestly haven't tried it. I love JG's tracks and probably would like it the most. But I find that the Rf tracks challenge me the most which is frustrating but I get more enjoyment once I get them figured out. Kind of weird.reddead422 wrote:Why isn't jgmx A1 an option we need to include all options next time guys cmon
i still would vote for rf sorry JG <3