2013 Zero MX

Post your suggestions here
DJ99X
Posts: 15524
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:36 am
Location: Land Down Under

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by DJ99X »

SOAB_465 wrote:They never show it doing anything REALLY big... I understand it's meant for back yard riding and camping and all that, but hear me out:

If I was trying to convince people to buy MY electric bike, and it was legitimately fast, as they say it is, I'd spend the $5-10000 on showa stuff for my video bike and show it hitting Larocco's leap or the step up at Pala. How many would you really need to sell to offset the cost of the suspension?
That'd be false advertising
Sweendoggy
Posts: 3649
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:10 am
Team: Lone Wolf
Location: California, US

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by Sweendoggy »

I rode one at Infineon a few years ago, one of the first models, and it was very strange! Linear power is a strange thing when you are used to moto lol Try doing a wheelie on these things and you'll know what I mean! haha I almost wrecked the thing a few times, but it was a blast for what it was haha
jlv
Site Admin
Posts: 15129
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 5:39 am
Team: No Frills Racing
Contact:

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by jlv »

Shadow wrote:
jlv wrote:It's GM, so they might just suck. :P

I'm going to remain skeptical about electric bikes claiming 54 HP until I see one that looks faster than a 30 year old 125.
It could very well have that.

We actually considered bolting a 32kW electric engine into our vehicle in one course at our uni where the goal was to design an electric vehicle to be raced against other electric vehicles and see which one uses less energy.
Opted for a 3.2kW that could handle 4-5x its nominal power during max load for a little while, so we still got 120Nm transmitted to the rear wheel from that little engine. :lol:
It did have some sort of high-tech cell solution, though I don't know the specifics of it since I was in the mechanical side of the project. The electronics in it were worth 20k euros. :shock:
The "car" weighed about 70-80kg and could be driven for a few hours without a recharge. Not in full power of course, and the regenerative braking helped increase the operating time.
3.2 kilowatts * 5 = 16 kilowatts = 21.4563534 hp = 30 year old 125

I'm not saying I'm against electric bikes. I'm saying the battery technology isn't there yet. If it were there it would already be in current electric cars.

If I were making an electric bike right now, I'd try to match a 250f's performance and weight by sacrificing run time. Switching batteries seems better than being overweight and under powered.
Josh Vanderhoof
Sole Proprietor
jlv@mxsimulator.com
If you email, put "MX Simulator" in the subject to make sure it gets through my spam filter.
JTmoto
Crushed Dissenter
Posts: 485
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:06 am
Team: Eleven10 Mods Suzuki

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by JTmoto »

jlv wrote:I'd try to match a 250f's performance and weight by sacrificing run time. Switching batteries seems better than being overweight and under powered.
And that wouldn't even be a downside for the average American. We spend countless money on gas everyday right? Not to mention the fact that gas prices are just going to keep raising anyways.
Image
jlv
Site Admin
Posts: 15129
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 5:39 am
Team: No Frills Racing
Contact:

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by jlv »

A 5 minute run time would suck, but I'd prefer that to an under powered bike that weighs 265 lbs. A 250 has about 60 lbs of motor + 6 lbs / gallon of fuel in it. I'd like to see a real chassis with 70 lbs of motor and battery producing 30-40 hp for whatever run time it could manage.
Josh Vanderhoof
Sole Proprietor
jlv@mxsimulator.com
If you email, put "MX Simulator" in the subject to make sure it gets through my spam filter.
Sweendoggy
Posts: 3649
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:10 am
Team: Lone Wolf
Location: California, US

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by Sweendoggy »

jlv wrote:A 5 minute run time would suck, but I'd prefer that to an under powered bike that weighs 265 lbs. A 250 has about 60 lbs of motor + 6 lbs / gallon of fuel in it. I'd like to see a real chassis with 70 lbs of motor and battery producing 30-40 hp for whatever run time it could manage.
It'll be a long time before it replaces MX, however I don't see anything wrong with a "lazy man's" BMX/mountain bike. I say lighten it up for sure, but power can come eventually, I want something to hop on and go hit a bunch of small stuff, or maybe even rip the thing around town or the skatepark haha.
cloud_2901
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 5:24 am
Team: Complete newbie

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by cloud_2901 »

Sweendoggy wrote:
jlv wrote:A 5 minute run time would suck, but I'd prefer that to an under powered bike that weighs 265 lbs. A 250 has about 60 lbs of motor + 6 lbs / gallon of fuel in it. I'd like to see a real chassis with 70 lbs of motor and battery producing 30-40 hp for whatever run time it could manage.
It'll be a long time before it replaces MX, however I don't see anything wrong with a "lazy man's" BMX/mountain bike. I say lighten it up for sure, but power can come eventually, I want something to hop on and go hit a bunch of small stuff, or maybe even rip the thing around town or the skatepark haha.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kbr01FLu0PA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7xlNrroFOA

One of these would be AWESOME once they get some kind of regenerative braking and a bit bigger - scratch that, longer lasting - battery.
jacksk8t12
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 2:54 am
Team: Jack Daniel's Racing

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by jacksk8t12 »

why don't they just put a mixture of electric and gas
DJ99X
Posts: 15524
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:36 am
Location: Land Down Under

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by DJ99X »

Too heavy. And that's only done for fuel economy reasons, which isn't a concern for MX bikes
jlv
Site Admin
Posts: 15129
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 5:39 am
Team: No Frills Racing
Contact:

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by jlv »

Sweendoggy wrote:It'll be a long time before it replaces MX, however I don't see anything wrong with a "lazy man's" BMX/mountain bike. I say lighten it up for sure, but power can come eventually, I want something to hop on and go hit a bunch of small stuff, or maybe even rip the thing around town or the skatepark haha.
What I'm saying is, if my options are run time, power and light weight, choose any two, I'd choose power and light weight. I could use a rest every couple of laps.
Josh Vanderhoof
Sole Proprietor
jlv@mxsimulator.com
If you email, put "MX Simulator" in the subject to make sure it gets through my spam filter.
Chris183
Posts: 149
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:13 pm
Team: Privateeeeer

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by Chris183 »

Finally, 2 and 4 stroke riders can come together for one common hatred, electric bikes
Dungey #5
Wilson #15
dani22
Posts: 1077
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:40 pm
Location: SPAIN
Contact:

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by dani22 »

DJ99X wrote:And holy shit that's a big rear sprocket
i'd say it's huge hahaha
MX_Gh0ST
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 1:33 pm
Team: [mo'Tards]
Location: Germany/Bavaria

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by MX_Gh0ST »

do it ! :D
______________________________________________________________________________________________

[MO'TARDS] - MX Simulator Team
supermoto - freeride - stunting - enduro

Like us on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/mxsmotards
http://www.mxs-motards.blogspot.com

We are searching members!
crashreallyfast
Posts: 286
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:28 pm
Team: TwistMoto

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by crashreallyfast »

Chris183 wrote:Finally, 2 and 4 stroke riders can come together for one common hatred, electric bikes
hate to see every1 hating on this bad boy lol. if i was fucking loaded i would definatly have one. not for the track, because 1, i feel like having no gears would cause problems, 2 the suspension would definatly be an issue. and 3, somthing breaks that involves the motor, i would have no idea were to start (reason i run 2-strokes, easy as hell to work on). however, reason i would own one, is for trail riding. issue with trail riding, is you kind of have to keep a slower pace in some places to be careful not to run into another rider comming the oppisite direction. with one of thoes, you could haul ball every were, and would be able to hear any other bikes comming. so long story short. for the track F*** NO (unless it was super super muddy, i would imagine that being a dream in that situation), for the trails... HELL yeah, would make riding so much more fun, and would obviously not have to worry about fowling plugs, or running low on gas or motor oil, etc.
Image
DJ99X
Posts: 15524
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:36 am
Location: Land Down Under

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by DJ99X »

Well, while you may not need to worry about running out of gas, you definitely would need to worry about flattening the battery.

As for something breaking in the motor, there's very little moving parts. Really, there's only a rotor and some bearings. Any issues would most likely be electrical, which would obviously require a professional.

As they are, they would definitely be great for sprints/enduros (as long as the entire event is 1-1.5 hours long).
Post Reply