Futuristic Honda

braap68 · Post by **braap68** » Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:39 am

I was looking at the 2015 CRF450R one day and I came across a really futuristic CRF model and I thought it would make a really cool MXS bike. I know absolutely nothing about making bikes so it would be great if someone could do this. link: https://www.behance.net/gallery/7122667 ... -Modelling

Scotty226 · Post by **Scotty226** » Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:44 am

Looks ugly imo

Fadez · Post by **Fadez** » Fri Sep 05, 2014 1:33 pm

If any bike company comes out with anything that ugly I'm quitting riding. It's just not worth it at that point.

jbrandmx85 · Post by **jbrandmx85** » Fri Sep 05, 2014 8:35 pm

Scotty226 wrote:Looks ugly imo

Bingo

AWood · Post by **AWood** » Fri Sep 05, 2014 9:19 pm

I feel like I would go to touch the plastics and slice my hand open on them.

JT43 · Post by **JT43** » Sun Sep 07, 2014 5:24 pm

Bad frame design. A bend there is unnecessary and just creates weak spots meaning there is a larger change of the frame failing and snapping meaning that the rider who was controlling the bike at that time would have a large risk of obtaining very serious injuries.

dbaum25moto · Post by **dbaum25moto** » Sun Sep 07, 2014 6:51 pm

Fadez wrote:If any bike company comes out with anything that ugly I'm quitting riding. It's just not worth it at that point.

Boblob801 · Post by **Boblob801** » Sun Sep 07, 2014 9:07 pm

JT43 wrote:Bad frame design. A bend there is unnecessary and just creates weak spots meaning there is a larger change of the frame failing and snapping meaning that the rider who was controlling the bike at that time would have a large risk of obtaining very serious injuries.

^^

Also it should have an electric motor. Tbh it looks like a mutated KTM, there electric bikes are heading in that direction.

cpt_Slow · Post by **cpt_Slow** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:20 pm

Yup, not to be too mean to the guy but you can tell he's a designer and not an engineer. I would have thought a degree in transport design would have some engineering content though, if just to make the lives of the engineers slightly easier. Also, I'm sure I'm not alone in thinking that cleverly optimising form for function, automatically makes it aesthetically pleasing anyway.

JT43 · Post by **JT43** » Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:41 pm

However, despite the faulty design, it is nicely modelled.

mxsrider96 · Post by **mxsrider96** » Tue Sep 09, 2014 3:18 pm

I read all the comments before even opening the link, and you guys give it too much credit. It looks much worse than ugly. The only thing that looks decent is the way the side number plates are, and I still prefer the current way of doing those

JT43 · Post by **JT43** » Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:20 pm

Gave it too much credit? Did you actually read the comments?

braap68 · Post by **braap68** » Wed Sep 10, 2014 11:56 pm

Way to crush my dreams...

JT43 · Post by **JT43** » Thu Sep 11, 2014 8:24 am

Your dream was to see a futuristic bike in a simulator?

mxsrider96 · Post by **mxsrider96** » Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:03 pm

JT43 wrote:Gave it too much credit? Did you actually read the comments?

If you actually read past the "too much credit" part, you'll see what I was saying

Futuristic Honda

Futuristic Honda

Re: Futuristic Honda

Re: Futuristic Honda

Re: Futuristic Honda

Re: Futuristic Honda

Re: Futuristic Honda

Re: Futuristic Honda

Re: Futuristic Honda

Re: Futuristic Honda

Re: Futuristic Honda

Re: Futuristic Honda

Re: Futuristic Honda

Re: Futuristic Honda

Re: Futuristic Honda

Re: Futuristic Honda