Page 2 of 2

Re: Vurbmoto 2.0

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 4:14 am
by AHeckman2
Atom6246 wrote:
808 wrote:Further proof that 99% of people on these forums under the age of 20 are complete asshats

Oi fook u m8 im 19

sameeee cept I'm 18 :lol: Let's just say everyone under 18 ;) Besides the occasional nice guy under 18

Re: Vurbmoto 2.0

Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:13 am
by Itz Raidox
AHeckman2 wrote:
Atom6246 wrote:
808 wrote:Further proof that 99% of people on these forums under the age of 20 are complete asshats

Oi fook u m8 im 19

sameeee cept I'm 18 :lol: Let's just say everyone under 18 ;) Besides the occasional nice guy under 18

im 16 and im a nice guy.... (kind of)

Re: Vurbmoto 2.0

Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2017 1:24 am
by 808
Itz Raidox wrote:
AHeckman2 wrote:
Atom6246 wrote:Oi fook u m8 im 19

sameeee cept I'm 18 :lol: Let's just say everyone under 18 ;) Besides the occasional nice guy under 18

im 16 and im a nice guy.... (kind of)

98%

Re: Vurbmoto 2.0

Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2017 1:34 am
by Brock1198
Itz Raidox wrote:
AHeckman2 wrote:
Atom6246 wrote:Oi fook u m8 im 19

sameeee cept I'm 18 :lol: Let's just say everyone under 18 ;) Besides the occasional nice guy under 18

im 16 and im a nice guy.... (kind of)

im 15 and im a total cunt

Re: Vurbmoto 2.0

Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2017 4:32 am
by TH_722
Atom6246 wrote:
808 wrote:Further proof that 99% of people on these forums under the age of 20 are complete asshats

Oi fook u m8 im 19

Point proven

Re: Vurbmoto 2.0

Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2017 6:21 am
by Itz Raidox
808 wrote:
Itz Raidox wrote:
AHeckman2 wrote:sameeee cept I'm 18 :lol: Let's just say everyone under 18 ;) Besides the occasional nice guy under 18

im 16 and im a nice guy.... (kind of)

98%

i dont get it?

Re: Vurbmoto 2.0

Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2017 10:46 pm
by 808
Itz Raidox wrote:
808 wrote:
Itz Raidox wrote:im 16 and im a nice guy.... (kind of)

98%

i dont get it?

i expanded the range of non-cunts because you guys claim to be non-cunts

Re: Vurbmoto 2.0

Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 1:02 am
by Itz Raidox
808 wrote:
Itz Raidox wrote:
808 wrote:98%

i dont get it?

i expanded the range of non-cunts because you guys claim to be non-cunts

aight

Re: Vurbmoto 2.0

Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 9:06 am
by RHYSHHS
well if it isn't Gardiner crying again 1st you added me to your team to try get admin on my server now second of all dont call them scammers until you remember what you did to me

Re: Vurbmoto 2.0

Posted: Thu Aug 03, 2017 7:46 pm
by RHYSHHS
Kenny154 wrote:WHEN THE SCAMMER GETS SCAMMED. *dun dun duhhhhhh*

Re: Vurbmoto 2.0

Posted: Fri Aug 04, 2017 1:27 am
by Itz Raidox
RHYSHHS wrote:well if it isn't Gardiner crying again 1st you added me to your team to try get admin on my server now second of all dont call them scammers until you remember what you did to me

Re: Vurbmoto 2.0

Posted: Wed Aug 09, 2017 11:32 pm
by Mr. Wiggles
I don't see this
jlv wrote:If you want to report someone, give me the following info:
1. A brief description of what they did wrong and the time that it happened. Use /toggletime to see the time.
2. A demo of the incident.
3. The numbers of the riders involved. If the rider doesn't have a number, say so.
4. The server where the incident occurred.

Rough passing is allowed. I'm only interested in banning people who are playing demolition derby instead of racing. By "demolition derby" I mean someone preventing the race from going on. That usually means randomly riding around and running into everyone in sight. If the rider is going around the track in the right direction and hitting all the gates it's very unlikely that I'll ban him.

Re: Vurbmoto 2.0

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 3:41 am
by Itz Raidox
Mr. Wiggles wrote:I don't see this
jlv wrote:If you want to report someone, give me the following info:
1. A brief description of what they did wrong and the time that it happened. Use /toggletime to see the time.
2. A demo of the incident.
3. The numbers of the riders involved. If the rider doesn't have a number, say so.
4. The server where the incident occurred.

Rough passing is allowed. I'm only interested in banning people who are playing demolition derby instead of racing. By "demolition derby" I mean someone preventing the race from going on. That usually means randomly riding around and running into everyone in sight. If the rider is going around the track in the right direction and hitting all the gates it's very unlikely that I'll ban him.

lol