i finally got this track up on pure so here is the link for the people that do not have it sorry it took so long never got the activation email to activate my account so i had to use another email address i had to make a account anyway here it is
http://www.puremxs.com/Tracks/TrackView ... rackID=118
Sx Invitation
Forum rules
If your topic doesn't contain a track link, this is the wrong place to post it.
If your topic doesn't contain a track link, this is the wrong place to post it.
-
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:22 am
- Team: Privateer
- Location: Southern Vermont
- Contact:
Re: Sx Invitation
Sick track. Not much more to say really.
Re: Sx Invitation
Certainly for me, one of the best!!! Great job!
Re: Sx Invitation
Was a good track. But as people have said, it had a few flaws. Alot of the jumps and landings were too sharp. One section was impossible for me to get rhythm. And that weird quad thingy 2 turns before the finish, wtf was that, lol.
But yeah, there were alot of good aspects to the track. It looked great (except for the oversaturated grass). The whoops rode great, some of the best for the game.
But yeah, there were alot of good aspects to the track. It looked great (except for the oversaturated grass). The whoops rode great, some of the best for the game.
Re: Sx Invitation
the quad section was not supposed to be a quad you were supposed to triple through it and i tried it one time and made it can't do it every lap but i can get it 2 or 3 times in a 5 lap race. thanks for the comments.
-
- Posts: 1095
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:05 am
- Team: Privateer
- Location: Trafford Alabama
Re: Sx Invitation
I agree with DJ. Specifically the section that was like double then 3 tables. You have to really ease up for the double. The step-on step-offs were the same way. You almost had to be half throttle if you carried any speed whatsoever through the corner before or you would over shoot the step-on. The triple landings were definitely too peaked.
1 thing that I'm probably the only person that noticed lol. Thank you for not putting the tuff blocks on the triple landings!!!! I know they didn't have collision anyway, but If you watch a pro sx, there are no bales on the main triple landings. The track is fun once you get your rhythm down. It is definitely a rhythm track as opposed to a "pin it to win it" type lol. The sand was pretty spot on also. Nice track dude. Keep up the good work.
1 thing that I'm probably the only person that noticed lol. Thank you for not putting the tuff blocks on the triple landings!!!! I know they didn't have collision anyway, but If you watch a pro sx, there are no bales on the main triple landings. The track is fun once you get your rhythm down. It is definitely a rhythm track as opposed to a "pin it to win it" type lol. The sand was pretty spot on also. Nice track dude. Keep up the good work.
R.I.P. Jacob Nash #241
PSN-chrismri463
xfire--cmarona463
PSN-chrismri463
xfire--cmarona463
-
- Posts: 4891
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 5:22 am
- Team: Privateer
- Location: Southern Vermont
- Contact:
Re: Sx Invitation
dearnhardtfan7 wrote:I agree with DJ. Specifically the section that was like double then 3 tables. You have to really ease up for the double. The step-on step-offs were the same way. You almost had to be half throttle if you carried any speed whatsoever through the corner before or you would over shoot the step-on. The triple landings were definitely too peaked. D
That's a part of the track I liked. Preaches throttle control and judgement.
-
- Posts: 633
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 4:16 pm
- Team: Privateer
- Location: Western Australia
- Contact: