2020 MotoOption Supercross Round 3 Anaheim 2

Post your tracks here
Forum rules
If your topic doesn't contain a track link, this is the wrong place to post it.
User avatar
DariusP8
Posts: 267
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2017 5:25 am
Team: Rival Decal
Location: Oregon

Re: 2020 MotoOption Supercross Round 2 St. Louis

Postby DariusP8 » Thu Jan 09, 2020 7:46 pm

RFX_corentin_12 wrote:
checkerz wrote:
RFX_corentin_12 wrote:Keep doing that and we will get the worst season in mx sim history in terms of tracks.

Go fuck yourself.

( I haven't even downloaded it, I worked on the old tracks, but your comment deserves that reply. )

Oh... go ask EMF how those attitudes do? And no matter how bad the rF tracks are, they won't be that bad. Yea, not scared to say it.

Obviously i didnt count EMF when i say that lmao, EMF are miles and miles behind rF, but honestly, idk what they doing, like the scale and all that is weird, the berms are so bad, feel like there is only half of the berms each turns. The whoops? Why are they so spaced out? it's so bad too, otherwise decals looks better than round 1, feels a bit plain on rd 1, better now

tbh with you chief track is badass, scaling I'd say seems more realistic, berms maybe a tad small but we getting these tracks all for free
Image

User avatar
Brina927
Posts: 2710
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:55 am
Team: Whipstyle
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Contact:

Re: 2020 MotoOption Supercross Round 2 St. Louis

Postby Brina927 » Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:09 pm

checkerz wrote:
RFX_corentin_12 wrote:Keep doing that and we will get the worst season in mx sim history in terms of tracks.

Go fuck yourself.

( I haven't even downloaded it, I worked on the old tracks, but your comment deserves that reply. )

Oh... go ask EMF how those attitudes do? And no matter how bad the rF tracks are, they won't be that bad. Yea, not scared to say it.

I rarely post, rarely complain. But on this..I have to do it.

This "RF can do no wrong" attitude is the problem. How can you improve if you automatically think that you're good no matter what? St. Louis was not a good track IMO and many others' opinion that I've spoken to. The spacing between jumps(especially the rhythm after start straight) is way too tight. Berms are small. And the whoops felt so awkward shaped. I felt like even top pros were struggling on this track. Hopefully this input helps to improve the tracks for the rest of the season. That's my only goal with this post.
My Stats
Discord: MxBrina#9694
jlv wrote:Team Motosport Honda's Brina made MX Simulator history as she became the first woman to take a win in a major series.

motocross_will
Posts: 948
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2014 2:26 am
Team: MV Films

Re: 2020 MotoOption Supercross Round 2 St. Louis

Postby motocross_will » Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:25 pm

In my honest probably biased opinion as someone that works on the tracks and seeing the time and effort that goes into it. I think the problem is the people that just say the tracks are shit and terrible, fuck this, fuck that. When people say that it makes all other feedback feel distasteful. The tracks are different this year. I think the point is to make the tracks more difficult than before. It is like people think that rF wants to make bad tracks. We are trying constantly to get better and better with every single round. It just takes time when you have new creators. I think St. Louis was good. The whoops weren't great which rF knows and will try to be better for next round, but other than that I really liked the track, and this is coming from someone that didn't even make the main event. That's my .02
Image

User avatar
Fro77
Posts: 493
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 10:16 pm
Team: TBR
Location: TurnBar Compound
Contact:

Re: 2020 MotoOption Supercross Round 2 St. Louis

Postby Fro77 » Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:40 pm

I thought this was the best sx track in a while but I like the technical tracks so I understand why some people wouldn't be fans
Ddavis wrote:You paid your $5 to do this shitty event so deal with it, everyone who wants their money back for whatever fucking reason, go get a job you poor bastard.

James_122 wrote:If you really want to know if Jesus is real, just ask Havoc They went to college together.

User avatar
aeffertz
Posts: 3684
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2014 7:01 am
Team: W.B.G
Location: Wiscansin

Re: 2020 MotoOption Supercross Round 2 St. Louis

Postby aeffertz » Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:57 pm

Normally I’m shit at whoops but rds. 1 and 2 I’ve been having tons of fun on the whoops. The biggest area we need to work on IMO is the berms.
Image

User avatar
honda708
Posts: 112
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:52 am
Location: NorCal

Re: 2020 MotoOption Supercross Round 2 St. Louis

Postby honda708 » Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:23 pm

Fro77 wrote:I thought this was the best sx track in a while but I like the technical tracks so I understand why some people wouldn't be fans

+1
Dcope

Raiders1629
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon May 18, 2015 5:20 am
Team: Rival Decal
Location: Washington, USA

Re: 2020 MotoOption Supercross Round 2 St. Louis

Postby Raiders1629 » Thu Jan 09, 2020 10:33 pm

So far i think the first two tracks have been really good, imo the only thing that sucks on them are the whoops. I feel the first half are good then near the end everyone's backend just kicks till death and i'm not the only one having the issue cause half the laps ive seen a big ass pile up in the berm. The rest has been really fun and technical
Kevin Ferzacca | Team: Rival Decal | National Numbers: #61 ('17) - #32 ('18) - #52 ('19) - #229 ('20)

Jones221
Posts: 5179
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:11 am
Location: California

Re: 2020 MotoOption Supercross Round 2 St. Louis

Postby Jones221 » Fri Jan 10, 2020 1:57 am

checkerz wrote:( I haven't even downloaded it, I worked on the old tracks, but your comment deserves that reply. )



Download it? I would love to read an honest opinion of track/traction..
if I’m still complaining on the internet over the age of 30 someone ban me
Image

User avatar
AWood
Posts: 4614
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:05 am
Team: Who Knows...
Location: Test Tracks and In N Out

Re: 2020 MotoOption Supercross Round 2 St. Louis

Postby AWood » Fri Jan 10, 2020 2:04 am

Haven’t ridden either yet so can’t put my own .02 in but in the overhead picture the whoops seem to increase length near the end? At least on the overhead pic from St. Louis that’s what I thought I saw. That could explain the kicking that ferzacca complained about. I’ll ride the tracks tonight and give my opinions
barrington314 wrote:awood is right

Leclair wrote:My name is barking

Leclair wrote:i fuck you

2014 rF GNC 22nd Overall - 2014 rF 450 SX 12th - 2014 rF 450 MX 11th Overall
2013 rF GNC 17th Overall - 2013 rF 450 SX 17th - 2013 rF 450 MX 8th - 2013 EMF French Cup Open World 6th

Haberfield24
Posts: 256
Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2014 7:43 pm

Re: 2020 MotoOption Supercross Round 2 St. Louis

Postby Haberfield24 » Fri Jan 10, 2020 2:14 am

AWood wrote:Haven’t ridden either yet so can’t put my own .02 in but in the overhead picture the whoops seem to increase length near the end? At least on the overhead pic from St. Louis that’s what I thought I saw. That could explain the kicking that ferzacca complained about. I’ll ride the tracks tonight and give my opinions

^^^^ X2

I really enjoyed the track, that was my only complaint though, when i wanted to lay off the gas a lil for the turn the whoops want you to do the opposite and speed up due to the bigger gaps. Had a few solid barrel rolls in the main due to getting off the gas and the front dippin. Other then that i thought the track was sick! Nice to have the 250/450 line difference. Makes it more realistic in my opinion

User avatar
nathanjames
Posts: 120
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2017 11:22 pm
Location: Toronto

Re: 2020 MotoOption Supercross Round 2 St. Louis

Postby nathanjames » Fri Jan 10, 2020 4:39 am

Brina927 wrote:
checkerz wrote:
RFX_corentin_12 wrote:Keep doing that and we will get the worst season in mx sim history in terms of tracks.

Go fuck yourself.

( I haven't even downloaded it, I worked on the old tracks, but your comment deserves that reply. )

Oh... go ask EMF how those attitudes do? And no matter how bad the rF tracks are, they won't be that bad. Yea, not scared to say it.

I rarely post, rarely complain. But on this..I have to do it.

This "RF can do no wrong" attitude is the problem. How can you improve if you automatically think that you're good no matter what? St. Louis was not a good track IMO and many others' opinion that I've spoken to. The spacing between jumps(especially the rhythm after start straight) is way too tight. Berms are small. And the whoops felt so awkward shaped. I felt like even top pros were struggling on this track. Hopefully this input helps to improve the tracks for the rest of the season. That's my only goal with this post.


RF are the ones making this series happen. They're taking time out of their lives and providing content for the community.

Constructive criticism is what's needed. Not this negative, unreasonable and selfish way a lot of people express their issues with the tracks.

Nothing RF does is wrong. It just may not please everybody.

Beggars can't be choosers. If you want it done right do it yourself...

Support the crew with a positive approach and you're going to get a positive response.

User avatar
checkerz
Posts: 8733
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:23 am
Team: RaGe Factory

Re: 2020 MotoOption Supercross Round 2 St. Louis

Postby checkerz » Fri Jan 10, 2020 8:33 am

Jones221 wrote:
checkerz wrote:( I haven't even downloaded it, I worked on the old tracks, but your comment deserves that reply. )



Download it? I would love to read an honest opinion of track/traction..

No. This community and the shitty ass attitude drove me completely away. I only dropped by to hope that my friends... those putting money and time into the game... were hopefully doing better.

Only met to see the same negative BS.

I can bet the traction didn't even change and the track is still better than 94% of anything released because otherwise rF wouldn't exist.

User avatar
Bradclay306
Posts: 350
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2016 4:42 pm
Location: UK

Re: 2020 MotoOption Supercross Round 2 St. Louis

Postby Bradclay306 » Fri Jan 10, 2020 10:44 am

Not put my pound coin in yet, I've received both negative and positive criticism, I would consider rd2 alot better than A1. Still alot of improvements to be made, but thats the process to creating the best template for SX at this scaling and difficulty. I think Sperm put it the best "previous year SX tracks didn't feel like SX tracks, you just hit a easy ass rhythm, and with this it has sx transitions so you actually have to have timing."

No shade to checkerz or Barrington as there tracks where amazing, I just feel like we needed to make things a little harder.

Its clear that we are trying something new, and we are making SX a little harder in terms of scalijg and timing and we will improve, as for all the bullshit comments such as zoa cross and Corentin Julian, don't like it? fuck off...
Image

User avatar
RFX_corentin_12
Posts: 883
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:26 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: 2020 MotoOption Supercross Round 2 St. Louis

Postby RFX_corentin_12 » Fri Jan 10, 2020 12:10 pm

Bradclay306 wrote:Not put my pound coin in yet, I've received both negative and positive criticism, I would consider rd2 alot better than A1. Still alot of improvements to be made, but thats the process to creating the best template for SX at this scaling and difficulty. I think Sperm put it the best "previous year SX tracks didn't feel like SX tracks, you just hit a easy ass rhythm, and with this it has sx transitions so you actually have to have timing."

No shade to checkerz or Barrington as there tracks where amazing, I just feel like we needed to make things a little harder.

Its clear that we are trying something new, and we are making SX a little harder in terms of scalijg and timing and we will improve, as for all the bullshit comments such as zoa cross and Corentin Julian, don't like it? fuck off...

I mean, obviously i was a bit rude saying it would be the worst season, i was tilted, sorry for that, but i've said what i personnaly didnt like and most of people who dont like the track too i guess: the berms, and the whoops.
Everything else is fine, scaling feels a bit weird in first cause we not used to that but its fine, but look how many guys goes down in or after the whoops cause someone crash and collide with another dude, so it makes a pile-up in the turn it doesnt make racing better, and the berms feels flat, i dont really know how to said it in english cause my english is not good, i dont talk abouth the berms being taller or whatever, but the curve of them, and the fact that it feel like they are like only half of the turn
2015 & 2016 3rd Pro Italian MX | 2018 2nd AUSMX 450
Image

User avatar
137
Posts: 2534
Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 1:31 am
Team: LCQ Studios / rF
Contact:

Re: 2020 MotoOption Supercross Round 2 St. Louis

Postby 137 » Fri Jan 10, 2020 5:37 pm

RFX_corentin_12 wrote:I mean, obviously i was a bit rude saying it would be the worst season, i was tilted, sorry for that


You’re honestly one of the most toxic people every single year but I have to see you ever release anything or try to make the game better in anyway. If you have I’d love to see it 8) people like you made me realize that I’m done with this toxic ass community after SX and MX. Everybody becomes track making professionals when they ride something they don’t like but yet I doubt they even know how to open the editor or use PS. If you don’t have any honest feedback on what we can work on and try to fix for the upcoming rounds to make people happy, you’re still gonna sound like a spoiled little girl. Just my .02, good day.
If you enjoy what I make, donate to the cause 8) It's very much appreciated!!
Image


Return to “Tracks”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: sdrew338, sol721 and 15 guests