2012 RACERX voting

I've heard conversation coming out of animal pens that is more intelligent than what is going on in here.
MXJProductions
Posts: 3880
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:26 pm
Team: MXJP
Location: Bushnell, Florida.

Re: 2012 RACERX voting

Post by MXJProductions »

Thank you all.

Pretty sweet video KSP! I honestly watched 20 seconds of the other one. How did that video make it? I am certain you will win this round dude.
paulr093
Posts: 918
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 11:33 pm

Re: 2012 RACERX voting

Post by paulr093 »

Keven, that video was sick!
Ddavis
Posts: 17965
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:02 am

Re: 2012 RACERX voting

Post by Ddavis »

Pumaxcs
Posts: 13209
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:50 pm
Team: Kyle/Luiz
Location: Western, Kentucky

Re: 2012 RACERX voting

Post by Pumaxcs »

I was kind and watched both. I believe anyone who doesn't know the guy who made the desert racing one will have a obvious choice. I've never been so bored watching a video about dirtbikes in my life.
Image
Everytime you post something stupid, a baby gets punched in the face. Please be smart, for the children.
MXS Cares
jlv wrote: Thu Nov 05, 2020 1:09 am Pumaxcs would know better than I do.
magnusson
Posts: 2618
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 12:38 am
Team: Wannabe
Contact:

Re: 2012 RACERX voting

Post by magnusson »

congrates jeff!! and again this is obvious win... KSP you got this for sure!! swesome video!
vurbmoto wrote: - Kevin Windham is still a BOSS
My Release's on PureMXS
KSP
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:55 pm

Re: 2012 RACERX voting

Post by KSP »

Pumaxcs wrote:I was kind and watched both. I believe anyone who doesn't know the guy who made the desert racing one will have a obvious choice. I've never been so bored watching a video about dirtbikes in my life.
:lol: :lol: :lol:


Thanks for the comments guys !! I try to not think too much about winning this round, we never know what can happen with those popularity contests !!
Pumaxcs
Posts: 13209
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:50 pm
Team: Kyle/Luiz
Location: Western, Kentucky

Re: 2012 RACERX voting

Post by Pumaxcs »

OH! Your him! :lol:

This whole last page makes a whole lot more sense now.
Image
Everytime you post something stupid, a baby gets punched in the face. Please be smart, for the children.
MXS Cares
jlv wrote: Thu Nov 05, 2020 1:09 am Pumaxcs would know better than I do.
KSP
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:55 pm

Re: 2012 RACERX voting

Post by KSP »

It would have been lot funnier if you said that, mine was the worst video you ever saw without knowing I would read it :lol:
MXJProductions
Posts: 3880
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:26 pm
Team: MXJP
Location: Bushnell, Florida.

Re: 2012 RACERX voting

Post by MXJProductions »

lol ^^^ Now you just need to buy MXS, and actually support the game eh?? :lol: :lol:
Pumaxcs
Posts: 13209
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:50 pm
Team: Kyle/Luiz
Location: Western, Kentucky

Re: 2012 RACERX voting

Post by Pumaxcs »

KSP wrote:It would have been lot funnier if you said that, mine was the worst video you ever saw without knowing I would read it :lol:
I'm not sure which of us is confused.I liked and voted for yours, I didn't like the other guy. I preferred watching whips and berms and the chick with little more clothing than I liked. Not a documentary about these guys doing a desert race.
Image
Everytime you post something stupid, a baby gets punched in the face. Please be smart, for the children.
MXS Cares
jlv wrote: Thu Nov 05, 2020 1:09 am Pumaxcs would know better than I do.
MXJProductions
Posts: 3880
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:26 pm
Team: MXJP
Location: Bushnell, Florida.

Re: 2012 RACERX voting

Post by MXJProductions »

Speaking of chicks. KSP? I am going to look like a dbag if it is your GF, but you couldn't get someone hotter from Quebec??? Haha Loved the video tho man, deff a diff touch on editing. :D
Pumaxcs
Posts: 13209
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:50 pm
Team: Kyle/Luiz
Location: Western, Kentucky

Re: 2012 RACERX voting

Post by Pumaxcs »

RacerX just put the two on Youtube. KSP has 42 likes/0 dislikes. Other guy has 6 likes/4 dislikes. Looking good.
Image
Everytime you post something stupid, a baby gets punched in the face. Please be smart, for the children.
MXS Cares
jlv wrote: Thu Nov 05, 2020 1:09 am Pumaxcs would know better than I do.
MXJProductions
Posts: 3880
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:26 pm
Team: MXJP
Location: Bushnell, Florida.

Re: 2012 RACERX voting

Post by MXJProductions »

Pumaxcs wrote:RacerX just put the two on Youtube. KSP has 42 likes/0 dislikes. Other guy has 6 likes/4 dislikes. Looking good.
Not it is at like 116 likes - 0 Dislikes. This other dude only has 22 likes. They should just end it now. Even tho KSP's video is pretty sweet, this guy did not stand a chance to start with. I seen better videos than that of the quad last week, and this desert film from the entries who did not make it. Wonder what the judges seen?
KSP
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:55 pm

Re: 2012 RACERX voting

Post by KSP »

MXJProductions wrote:Speaking of chicks. KSP? I am going to look like a dbag if it is your GF, but you couldn't get someone hotter from Quebec??? Haha Loved the video tho man, deff a diff touch on editing. :D
Hahah thanks man !!! And yeah that girl, she do a lot of photography modeling etc and I worked with her in the past and I knew she would be interested and would not complain even if it was -1 that day so it was way easier :wink:
More of her here: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Mylène-La ... 02?fref=ts
KSP
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2012 8:55 pm

Re: 2012 RACERX voting

Post by KSP »

I already have some haters !! :lol: :lol:
On the youtube comments, that guy said: '' Like i said..... The D-bag that made this went straight to the "sex sells" card in a desperate attempt to win. Those of you that cant see it are morons. The video sucks. J.Scotts is 100% better. ''

Jeff is that one of your friend ? hahahahaha :wink:

Seriously I find this quite funny since, we see the girl for like 5 seconds AND it's something common not only in the mx but pretty much anywhere ( advertising etc ) I love haters :lol:
Post Reply