Pure Beauty (Car Version)

I've heard conversation coming out of animal pens that is more intelligent than what is going on in here.
will96
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:59 pm

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by will96 »

pulse wrote:
will96 wrote:
Creeping this thread and pulled this from last January. Your taste really changed, Pulse.
changed?.... cant tell if serious.

Im a die hard toyota fan. hole left arm is tattooed of 80's and lower toyota emblems.

first car was a ma70 (mk3 supra) ordered a 7mge from japan, and rebuilt it.
2nd car- my x72 cressida wagon that I stanced out.
3rd car- turbo mk3 supra that seized on me in 3 weeks due to bad turbo.
4th and current car. x62 cressida wagon that im building for local drift events but also stancing it at the same time. just ordered 14kg springs and 15x10-88 wheels
Nah it was sarcasm. I like the car too. I just found it funny to see the same picture come up almost a year apart.
Image
[color=#FF0000]jlv[/color] wrote:I'd probably ban him if I understood what he just said.
supercross711
Posts: 3032
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:15 pm
Location: North Carolina USA

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by supercross711 »

Image
Image
P2sta wrote:Read it again, you are going full are going full 'meurican here.
pulse
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:06 am

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by pulse »

supercross711 wrote:I bought it for 3500 pulse. The shell is easily in the top 10 of cleanest cressidas in America. Motor rebuild was done really good along with tranny, only problem is it needs cam seals and and exhaust built which is easy. Its on Megan coils so basically BC. Literally EVERYTHING electronic works.
thats a good deal! he was first asking 7k!
Image
pulse
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:06 am

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by pulse »

any plans? or just leave it as is. and daily? while I guess you build the bmw?
Image
supercross711
Posts: 3032
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:15 pm
Location: North Carolina USA

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by supercross711 »

Yeah just daily it for now, eventually get some real wheels and theres small talk of putting the bmw v8 in it once we get the ls in the e34.
Image
P2sta wrote:Read it again, you are going full are going full 'meurican here.
pulse
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:06 am

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by pulse »

supercross711 wrote:Yeah just daily it for now, eventually get some real wheels and theres small talk of putting the bmw v8 in it once we get the ls in the e34.
i diss approve. just do a 7mgte and call it a day. cheap, easy to get power and bolt in.
Image
supercross711
Posts: 3032
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:15 pm
Location: North Carolina USA

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by supercross711 »

meh, im not that motivated too boost the 7m or keep working with 7ms. Would put a 1j or 2j in before i went 7mgte i think. Nothing against the 7m at all just, idk. haha
Image
P2sta wrote:Read it again, you are going full are going full 'meurican here.
pulse
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:06 am

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by pulse »

supercross711 wrote:meh, im not that motivated too boost the 7m or keep working with 7ms. Would put a 1j or 2j in before i went 7mgte i think. Nothing against the 7m at all just, idk. haha
1. cheaper.
2.easier to get power out of.
3.bolt in.

you want a 7mgte block.

dont do a 7mget.
Image
pulse
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:06 am

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by pulse »

Image
Image

just got a top end for my 6mgte build.
next is 7mgte rods.
and 81-82 5mge pistons and a hks 2mm head gasket and arp head bolts.
Image
pulse
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:06 am

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by pulse »

Image
Image
will96
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:59 pm

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by will96 »

Image
Image
[color=#FF0000]jlv[/color] wrote:I'd probably ban him if I understood what he just said.
pulse
Posts: 2053
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:06 am

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by pulse »

will96 wrote:Image
love that hilux
Image
squirrelboy86
Posts: 583
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:16 pm
Team: SD | Action Suzuki

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by squirrelboy86 »

Nitrous is bad mmmkay, tuner/builder driving because I didn't want to spray without getting use to the car more, he rolled into it slowly in 3rd around 70mph. Hit ~210-215mph then the front carbon fiber splitter got torn off :shock: :shock:. Never planned on going that fast ever, just plain stupid. Felt sick all afternoon thinking about it, also he is not a bad driver missing 5th, car makes so much power (~1000whp) that it makes it impossible to hit 5th without letting off for a little bit with the MGW shifter.

Image
Image
Image
Roy Mitchell wrote:I got cockblocked by the refrigerator
Click for go fast.
On The Pipe
Posts: 1350
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2010 2:51 am
Team: Factory Suzuki

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by On The Pipe »

pulse wrote:
will96 wrote:Image
love that hilux
Yeah that truck is really nice clean and simple. Not really a fan of stancing, but lowering the truck gives it a nice look. Would make a great bike hauler if the bed is big enough?
supercross711
Posts: 3032
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:15 pm
Location: North Carolina USA

Re: Pure Beauty (Car Version)

Post by supercross711 »

Looks more drift ready than "stanced" but its pretty clean to be drifting.
Image
P2sta wrote:Read it again, you are going full are going full 'meurican here.
Post Reply