Page 7 of 28

Re: 2018 SX discussion

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 6:35 pm
by KTM57
Don't get me wrong. I feel for the guy. In 2009 I had a 144 with roughly as much power as a 2017 RMZ250. It was not a great supercross bike. :lol:

Do we rate Suzuki 250F and O'Neal gear the year after a 250 championship as better or worse than Mookie's no ride after a title?

Re: 2018 SX discussion

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 7:46 pm
by TeamHavocRacing
I 'm sure all yall would be totally modest if you earned it lol.
model_90 wrote:Note to self: In order to summon Havoc, talk sh*t about any member of the Hill family.

Of course. I'm not going to sit idly by while you mealy mouthed teenyboppers rake my homie across the coals out of jealousy. How many numbers has he run just to get to #1? I won't be able to remember them all. Let's see... 154 316 317 36 46 etc.

Re: 2018 SX discussion

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 7:47 pm
by mxsrider96
I mean you can't blame the guy for being proud. I'll agree it's a little overboard, but at the end of the day, it's his shit, and he's showing his pride in his abilities

Re: 2018 SX discussion

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 8:23 pm
by TeamHavocRacing
In all fairness, I think Josh might have taken the flaunting farther if he would have gotten the number one plate. I had a good laugh yesterday when I watched the second episode of "Don't Watch This" when they ask Monte near the beginning of the video how Justin's going to do at Shoug and he's just like "no!"

Re: 2018 SX discussion

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 10:16 pm
by Ddavis
Justin didn't sign with Suzuki for the RMZ250, it's the 450 he'll be on next year.

Re: 2018 SX discussion

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 10:45 pm
by BradyS21
KTM57 wrote:Don't get me wrong. I feel for the guy. In 2009 I had a 144 with roughly as much power as a 2017 RMZ250. It was not a great supercross bike. :lol:

Do we rate Suzuki 250F and O'Neal gear the year after a 250 championship as better or worse than Mookie's no ride after a title?

There is nothing wrong with it! All the other teams on them in the field have no wor..... oh fuck.

Re: 2018 SX discussion

Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:14 pm
by mxsrider96

Re: 2018 SX discussion

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 9:54 am
by Wahlamt
Someone commented "is it high enough?", I wonder that too. If someone comes flying full speed, I doubt that net is enough. Also couldn't that be a safety hazard? If you plow your back into the net-pole or something? Well maybe that's better than flying off completely...

Re: 2018 SX discussion

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 2:33 pm
by mxsrider96
Wahlamt wrote:Someone commented "is it high enough?", I wonder that too. If someone comes flying full speed, I doubt that net is enough. Also couldn't that be a safety hazard? If you plow your back into the net-pole or something? Well maybe that's better than flying off completely...

I think the angle of Weigandt's pic makes it look shorter than it truly is, could be wrong though. Also, those are some thick pads on there. If you're unlucky enough to hit it, you'll get bent in a weird way, but I doubt you'll feel any pain from the pole impact itself, if that makes sense

Re: 2018 SX discussion

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:42 pm
by Pumaxcs
Track looks very soft and rhythms really shallow. Weird and fast layout.

Re: 2018 SX discussion

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 10:48 pm
by Dunivant25
ET3 will not be racing at Houston tonight. Moneys on Anderson then.

Re: 2018 SX discussion

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:26 pm
by Ddavis
My top 5 for tonight

Roczen
Anderson
Marvin
Seely
Brayton
12th for rmfantasy is JG33

Re: 2018 SX discussion

Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:29 pm
by nickuzick
Image
Too bad Tomac isn't racing. He was a -1 handicap but eligible for 2x points

Re: 2018 SX discussion

Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 3:08 am
by TeamHavocRacing
Is Aaron pleasanter the first MX simulator alumni to win a main event?

Re: 2018 SX discussion

Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 3:09 am
by TeamHavocRacing
*Plessinger ofc . Preview fail.