2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Organize races and post results here
SKlein
Posts: 376
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 7:08 pm
Team: Evergood
Location: MN

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by SKlein »

mxsrider96 wrote:Does anyone know why everything I click the "Events" button on the site when on my phone, it sends me to the page to buy MXS? Works fine on the PC, but it happens 100% of the time on my phone, even when I zoom in all the way, which should eliminate the possibility of me clicking the wrong button
Image
The highlighted portion is redirecting to that page, I PM'd Wheels about it a week or two ago when I noticed it.
Image
mxsrider96
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:15 am
Team: PoGo
Location: Indiana

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by mxsrider96 »

mxsrider96 wrote:Works fine on the PC
Turns out this was incorrect. I forgot that on PC, you only hover over the events button to get the drop down menu to appear. Sorry for any confusion
WAR CRY <3
Sun Burn
wheels1758
Posts: 4132
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:20 pm
Location: Washington, USA
Contact:

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by wheels1758 »

SKlein wrote:
mxsrider96 wrote:Does anyone know why everything I click the "Events" button on the site when on my phone, it sends me to the page to buy MXS? Works fine on the PC, but it happens 100% of the time on my phone, even when I zoom in all the way, which should eliminate the possibility of me clicking the wrong button
Image
The highlighted portion is redirecting to that page, I PM'd Wheels about it a week or two ago when I noticed it.
Because Wheels doesn't know how to use CSS.
wheels1758
Posts: 4132
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:20 pm
Location: Washington, USA
Contact:

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by wheels1758 »

wheels1758 wrote:
SKlein wrote:
mxsrider96 wrote:Does anyone know why everything I click the "Events" button on the site when on my phone, it sends me to the page to buy MXS? Works fine on the PC, but it happens 100% of the time on my phone, even when I zoom in all the way, which should eliminate the possibility of me clicking the wrong button
Image
The highlighted portion is redirecting to that page, I PM'd Wheels about it a week or two ago when I noticed it.
Because Wheels doesn't know how to use CSS.
Scratch that, Wheels is bad at HTML.
wheels1758
Posts: 4132
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:20 pm
Location: Washington, USA
Contact:

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by wheels1758 »

Should be fixed now though.
Mxs Racer 303
Posts: 582
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 7:43 am
Location: California

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by Mxs Racer 303 »

Can you check the license
mxsrider96
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:15 am
Team: PoGo
Location: Indiana

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by mxsrider96 »

wheels1758 wrote:Should be fixed now though.
I tank you very much
WAR CRY <3
Sun Burn
jlv
Site Admin
Posts: 14980
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 5:39 am
Team: No Frills Racing
Contact:

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by jlv »

AWood wrote:
barrington314 wrote:
AWood wrote: They're about that tall In real life.
You aren't doing well so far, are you able to actually prove this one? :lol:
Actually don't think this has gone that bad so far.

Wait. You ACTUALLY think a big bowl turn isn't close to 7.5?
Even 5 feet is being generous. The track blueprints usually specify 4 feet for 180s and 3 for 90s.
Josh Vanderhoof
Sole Proprietor
jlv@mxsimulator.com
If you email, put "MX Simulator" in the subject to make sure it gets through my spam filter.
AWood
Posts: 4657
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:05 am
Team: Who Knows...
Location: Test Tracks and In N Out

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by AWood »

jlv wrote: Even 5 feet is being generous. The track blueprints usually specify 4 feet for 180s and 3 for 90s.
Checked SD's, it was 5 foot. I just was going off personal experience walking multiple SX tracks IRL with bowl turns taller than me at 6'3", so i just assumed they would have the same or taller IRL.
barrington314 wrote:awood is right
Leclair wrote:My name is barking
Leclair wrote:i fuck you
2014 rF GNC 22nd Overall - 2014 rF 450 SX 12th - 2014 rF 450 MX 11th Overall
2013 rF GNC 17th Overall - 2013 rF 450 SX 17th - 2013 rF 450 MX 8th - 2013 EMF French Cup Open World 6th
motokid499
Posts: 1611
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:25 am
Team: Phil's
Location: Vancouver Island
Contact:

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by motokid499 »

AWood wrote:
jlv wrote: Even 5 feet is being generous. The track blueprints usually specify 4 feet for 180s and 3 for 90s.
Checked SD's, it was 5 foot. I just was going off personal experience walking multiple SX tracks IRL with bowl turns taller than me at 6'3", so i just assumed they would have the same or taller IRL.
how is it measured though? 5 feet from the plywood or 5 feet from the base dirt?
Tanner Rogers
Mx644
Posts: 43
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 7:03 pm

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by Mx644 »

I requested a novice license sense it was supposed to be free but it says pending, do I have to do something else?
yFMX
Posts: 318
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 9:19 pm
Team: Privateer
Location: France

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by yFMX »

motokid499 wrote:
AWood wrote:
jlv wrote: Even 5 feet is being generous. The track blueprints usually specify 4 feet for 180s and 3 for 90s.
Checked SD's, it was 5 foot. I just was going off personal experience walking multiple SX tracks IRL with bowl turns taller than me at 6'3", so i just assumed they would have the same or taller IRL.
how is it measured though? 5 feet from the plywood or 5 feet from the base dirt?
From the high resolution terrain in google earth, which seems to be acurate height wise since the 3', 4', 5' footers and triples are 3, 4, 5 and 6ft, the bowl turns range from 4ft to almost 7ft on the test tracks.
Image
AWood
Posts: 4657
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:05 am
Team: Who Knows...
Location: Test Tracks and In N Out

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by AWood »

5 from dirt base basically. They're not perfect though, Anaheim 1 "5 footers" were not even close to San diegos. Etc. a lot of things aren't built to scale, and some whoops are huge but then a2 could be a foot tall. Which is what makes me think a lot of bowl turns especially back east are 6+. Anaheim is lacking dirt IMO and they are building tracks really inconsistently. I know geico up dad track at milestone, milestone public, a few test tracks KTM/Honda/tld all have berms taller than me. So I had just assumed there would be ones in SX that are 6+
barrington314 wrote:awood is right
Leclair wrote:My name is barking
Leclair wrote:i fuck you
2014 rF GNC 22nd Overall - 2014 rF 450 SX 12th - 2014 rF 450 MX 11th Overall
2013 rF GNC 17th Overall - 2013 rF 450 SX 17th - 2013 rF 450 MX 8th - 2013 EMF French Cup Open World 6th
barrington314
Posts: 6614
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 6:03 pm
Team: me
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by barrington314 »

Sometimes they do mark them as 4 footers in rhythm lanes.
Image
barrington314
Posts: 6614
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 6:03 pm
Team: me
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by barrington314 »

Image
open in a new window to see full size.
But that 4' at the end of rhythm lane (second to last jump) looks a lot closer to the height of the berm than the 6' tall triple does.

http://archives.amasupercross.com/xml/s ... ackmap.pdf
Post Reply