2016 rF Pro MotoOption and Am FAMmx Supercross Series

Organize races and post results here
Dunivant25
Posts: 1256
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:41 pm

Re: 2016 rF Pro MotoOption and Am FAMmx Supercross Series

Post by Dunivant25 »

WellsMX524 wrote:Like someone said above, I like the idea of limited qualifying, especially being an older, busier man. It gets tough trying to compete with the 13 year old homeschooled week in and week out.
Shots fired at Rush
Image
Rush
Crushed Dissenter
Posts: 1465
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 1:18 am
Team: Balenciaga
Location: Paris

Re: 2016 rF Pro MotoOption and Am FAMmx Supercross Series

Post by Rush »

nfg m8
Image
Image
Jared133mx wrote:if you have anything else to say you can shoot my mom a message :wink:
mxsrider96
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:15 am
Team: PoGo
Location: Indiana

Re: 2016 rF Pro MotoOption and Am FAMmx Supercross Series

Post by mxsrider96 »

I hated limited qualifying when it was used, but now that we've reverted back to unlimited, I definitely think limited is the way to go. Too many people have all the time in the world to sit here and try hard. I feel like the pro classes would contain at least a bit cleaner racing with limited qualifying. WI would be the absolute best way to go, but most schedules don't allow for that, I believe Wheels' schedule would probably be included in that group of schedules as well
WAR CRY <3
Sun Burn
GustavoMX930'
Posts: 1962
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:59 pm
Team: 2 good 4 a team

Re: 2016 rF Pro MotoOption and Am FAMmx Supercross Series

Post by GustavoMX930' »

winter indoor or riot
jlv wrote:
Rush wrote:Why was UID 12235 not banned as well? he was doing the same thing.
Because he didn't come in here and confess like an idiot.
Ddavis
Posts: 17965
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:02 am

Re: 2016 rF Pro MotoOption and Am FAMmx Supercross Series

Post by Ddavis »

I don't really like WI, but limited qualifying where you get two sessions was definitely a lot nicer.
model_90
Posts: 1051
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 11:22 pm
Team: Heemlock

Re: 2016 rF Pro MotoOption and Am FAMmx Supercross Series

Post by model_90 »

Ddavis wrote:I don't really like WI, but limited qualifying where you get two sessions was definitely a lot nicer.
wow i actually agree with Ddavis
Peters as sharp as a mouse dick-Ol' PizzaChet
Image
T_Frye127
Posts: 923
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 2:15 am
Team: Volcom
Location: NW Indiana
Contact:

Re: 2016 rF Pro MotoOption and Am FAMmx Supercross Series

Post by T_Frye127 »

GustavoMX930' wrote:winter indoor or riot

prolly the only thing me and gutavo have agreed on ;p
Atom6246
Posts: 3996
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:28 am
Contact:

Re: 2016 rF Pro MotoOption and Am FAMmx Supercross Series

Post by Atom6246 »

I love WI qualifying, 2 sessions is whack because you could get fucked over on both motos. Just my opinion.
KidzRuS
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2015 6:45 pm
Team: Privateer
Location: Bitchigan

Re: 2016 rF Pro MotoOption and Am FAMmx Supercross Series

Post by KidzRuS »

Atom6246 wrote:I love WI qualifying, 2 sessions is whack because you could get fucked over on both motos. Just my opinion.
:D
Image







Image
lipps199
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2015 4:47 pm
Team: Privateer

Re: 2016 rF Pro MotoOption and Am FAMmx Supercross Series

Post by lipps199 »

WellsMX524 wrote:Like someone said above, I like the idea of limited qualifying, especially being an older, busier man. It gets tough trying to compete with the 15 year old homeschooled week in and week out.
I don't know if you're being sarcastic or not and since I'm lazy I won't read anything before this.

On a serious and related note, I'm 28 years old with a full time job. I love MX Sim but its hard to keep up with these younger dudes that have a bit more time on their hands. Nothing against them they will be my age soon enough. Anyhow, I would love to have let a amateur vet class to race for a championship. I don't want any prizes. Just fun racing.

TBH, I'm not fast at all. I can hardly get a clean lap in on these 2016 tracks but I'd race a stock track supercross series.
Jeremy150
Posts: 3368
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 9:56 am
Team: MV Films

Re: 2016 rF Pro MotoOption and Am FAMmx Supercross Series

Post by Jeremy150 »

If you guys are going to release the track shortly before the normal race time, could you guys push the race back like maybe an hour or so? A lot of us work and get off just before the race even starts on Thursdays.
Image
CeeJayHDz
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2015 5:05 pm
Team: Privateer

Re: 2016 rF Pro MotoOption and Am FAMmx Supercross Series

Post by CeeJayHDz »

on a change of subject, i dont suppose anyone has the 250 main demo from atlanta do they? <3
Image
Ktmrdr11
Posts: 889
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 4:25 am
Team: I think Vurb
Location: Joplin, MO

Re: 2016 rF Pro MotoOption and Am FAMmx Supercross Series

Post by Ktmrdr11 »

is that what they are doing with the track release? not pushing, just curious
Racers52
Posts: 3228
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 8:10 pm
Location: Texas
Contact:

Re: 2016 rF Pro MotoOption and Am FAMmx Supercross Series

Post by Racers52 »

Ktmrdr11 wrote:is that what they are doing with the track release? not pushing, just curious
myself and barrington ran into some complications with wheels scripts and our versions of python. Track should be out today though.
JS19
Crushed Dissenter
Posts: 345
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 7:23 am
Location: Georgia

Re: 2016 rF Pro MotoOption and Am FAMmx Supercross Series

Post by JS19 »

is this gonna delay the race tomorow or no?
Post Reply