Hi Im Skyqe wrote:
Some of the guys who were competing with Sean are still in the class so get on there case to pick it up. You guys are spending more time analyzing Dickerson than you are running laps. Same argument different year.
Here is why he was able to race Pro and continue to ride Amateurs. It is that way on purpose for nationals to allow B licensed riders to try and qualify for Pro and if they don't still ride Amateur with a B license. If they do qualify, they can't ride Ams that week.T_Frye127 wrote:Hi Im Skyqe wrote:
Some of the guys who were competing with Sean are still in the class so get on there case to pick it up. You guys are spending more time analyzing Dickerson than you are running laps. Same argument different year.
i mean the kid is clearly fast enough to race pro if he qualified for highpoint lol then you guys let him move back down to ams because he got smoked after his first race? lul yeah lets allow a kid to win the am class by 30 seconds each week.. sickk lol
checkerz wrote:We have a rule in place if it becomes and issue:Mxguy215 wrote:Isiah DIckerson
However, if we move him up, someone else will be winning and then guys will say he needs moved up and so on. So for the time being, we'll let him get his experience running at the front of the pack and at some point (Possibly after outdoors, possibly mid-season) if he hasn't moved himself up and the results continue to excel he will be ready to be moved up.
We don't want to rush to move anyone up because once you go to the Pro side, you may never have a chance to win again. Not sure if you've seen, but those guys are insane. Sean Klein who many called a sandbagger last year is still a year later fighting for top 10's.
So, TECHNICALLY, he could win a moto, and still be in ams the following week?checkerz wrote:There is no rule saying if you score a point you can't go back into Amateurs in the same season.
TeamHavocRacing wrote:it's all the liberals fault
FixedDBRider251 wrote:So, TECHNICALLY, he could win a Pro moto, and still be in ams the following week?checkerz wrote:There is no rule saying if you score a point you can't go back into Amateurs in the same season.
TeamHavocRacing wrote:it's all the liberals fault
This is my opinion.. EVERY year this happens, it is always someone different who is faster and it is always the same argument from the same group of riders (The ones who would be winning if he wasn't present). It is kind of funny that the tables have turned and Sean Klein is being used as a bargaining tactic this year.DBRider251 wrote:I don't see how you're not advocating for someone to move up that obviously doesn't belong in the class. The only people that finished top 10 in points last year that were battling Sean that are still in Am's are Atkinson and Doyon, so?
All I'm trying to say is that it isn't fun for a B rider to be competing with an A rider.
mmmhmm. And as you're finding out, winning in the pros is tough. Bet it is nice to have gotten a chance to win before moving up.Clfitty wrote:Reminds me of people wanting me to move up and calling me a sandbagger in ams supercross when I've only had the game a year, then I struggled to make mains because of the race pace.
Get him Checkerscheckerz wrote:mmmhmm. And as you're finding out, winning in the pros is tough. Bet it is nice to have gotten a chance to win before moving up.Clfitty wrote:Reminds me of people wanting me to move up and calling me a sandbagger in ams supercross when I've only had the game a year, then I struggled to make mains because of the race pace.
Well well well...Hi Im Skyqe wrote: It is kind of funny that the tables have turned and Sean Klein is being used as a bargaining tactic this year.
That was no way an attack at Cameron, but in fact saying to everyone else that was complaining about him that letting him stay was justified.Mxs Racer 303 wrote:Get him Checkerscheckerz wrote:mmmhmm. And as you're finding out, winning in the pros is tough. Bet it is nice to have gotten a chance to win before moving up.Clfitty wrote:Reminds me of people wanting me to move up and calling me a sandbagger in ams supercross when I've only had the game a year, then I struggled to make mains because of the race pace.
I still find it kinda weird to see this. I was moved up after one season of supercross, sure I won the title but I had a best finish of 3rd. As in, 0 wins. Now, I'm barely even making it into the motos in pro. I can't help but feel a bit robbed of my time in ams and chances to improve if this was your stance on the situation. This guy is faster than I ever was, won every single moto he's raced this season, and made it into a pro moto, yet still is allowed to move back down. Not that I would move down again at this point anyway, I just find it hard to take the "move up" rules seriously when they seem to be so inconsistent. I know I bitch a fair amount about this so I'll try to make this the last time I mention it. Pardon the rant.checkerz wrote: We don't want to rush to move anyone up because once you go to the Pro side, you may never have a chance to win again. Not sure if you've seen, but those guys are insane. Sean Klein who many called a sandbagger last year is still a year later fighting for top 10's.
