Page 1 of 5

RFG supercross question

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 2:53 am
by Whiteracing204
I have a question for RFG sx and mx... can you race a 250 2 stroke in 250AMS

Re: RFG supercross question

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 10:54 am
by mx201
Who said there is gonna be rf Supercross :shock:

Re: RFG supercross question

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 11:37 am
by Atom6246
mx201 wrote:Who said there is gonna be rf Supercross :shock:

Who said there is gonna be ams :shock:

Re: RFG supercross question

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:28 pm
by motokid499
My understanding is they are trying really hard to get erode to work well on supercross, and staff members aren't wanting to do non erode races when the feature is there so it might be erode or bust.

Re: RFG supercross question

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:31 pm
by AHeckman2
I know at least one of the track creators isn’t coming back unless the kickers on the lips of jumps that form with erode are fixed. I hope they still host the series even if erode is a bust for this season.

Re: RFG supercross question

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 5:26 pm
by Matias43_
Erode sucks. Its gonna ruin racing atleast for sx, just my opinion

Re: RFG supercross question

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 5:28 pm
by Matias43_
Correction*** erode doesnt suck in general but after testing it out on sx on tracks and racing with people on it, it doesnt seem like a great idea. Random kickers that allow you to five into sections and stupid stuff like that. But erode in general is dope, i just dont think it should be brought into the sx racing scene

Re: RFG supercross question

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 5:35 pm
by garrettolver
Whether they implement erode or not, I hope to see another year of sx. I personally, would give it more time until it is perfected or until we have the best understanding of how to use the feature to its full potential.
no supercross 2018=death of mxs

Re: RFG supercross question

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:04 pm
by motokid499
I think there needs to be some mach races with erode.

Re: RFG supercross question

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:27 pm
by Ddavis
I think they should do Supercross without erode, then Outdoors with erode.

Re: RFG supercross question

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:50 pm
by Cusano120
Ddavis wrote:I think they should do Supercross without erode, then Outdoors with erode.

Re: RFG supercross question

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:52 pm
by AHeckman2
Cusano120 wrote:
Ddavis wrote:I think they should do Supercross without erode, then Outdoors with erode.

Re: RFG supercross question

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:56 pm
by garrettolver
AHeckman2 wrote:
Cusano120 wrote:
Ddavis wrote:I think they should do Supercross without erode, then Outdoors with erode.

Re: RFG supercross question

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:59 pm
by RhysHarris
AHeckman2 wrote:
Cusano120 wrote:
Ddavis wrote:I think they should do Supercross without erode, then Outdoors with erode.

Re: RFG supercross question

Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 8:32 pm
by Abear944
Ddavis wrote:I think they should do Supercross without erode, then Outdoors with erode.