THE OFFICIAL MXS SX SERIES: 2020 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur) (NA)

Organize races and post results here
NineFour
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2020 2:56 pm
Team: Privateer
Location: Miami, FL

Re: THE OFFICIAL MXS SX SERIES: 2020 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur) (NA)

Postby NineFour » Sun Mar 01, 2020 7:22 pm

zg290 wrote:Anyone know how to recover a username on rf? or who to talk to?

Jeremy#9852 on discord

User avatar
Jeremy150
Posts: 2075
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 9:56 am
Team: MV Films

Re: THE OFFICIAL MXS SX SERIES: 2020 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur) (NA)

Postby Jeremy150 » Sun Mar 01, 2020 7:54 pm

zg290 wrote:Anyone know how to recover a username on rf? or who to talk to?

Message our support bot in our discord
discord.gg/qXdegGf
Image

User avatar
Snopro704
Posts: 820
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:30 am

Re: THE OFFICIAL MXS SX SERIES: 2020 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur) (NA)

Postby Snopro704 » Mon Mar 02, 2020 8:59 pm

motokid499 wrote:I know they try to make it realistic by having timed qualifying before the race, and honestly i'm all for it. Your idea is good Will, but I didnt mind back in the day when people had their own sessions to themselves, but are restricted to 3 qualifying sessions. They could try to combine the two qualifying styles, and maybe lock the servers to a maximum of 5 people per session at a time, then restrict everyone to 3 sessions each maximum. You would have to release the track earlier though to extend qualifying time, maybe an extra hour. This makes each session have less traffic for riders and also caps the amount of sessions a rider can do, to make sure its fair for everyone.


This. I like qualifying now as a concept but with 60 plus signups and limited servers it’s been a joke for 250 East. All it takes is one miracle send lap in this game and the hour with busy servers just isn’t working.

I think with erode now especially we need more time. 3 sessions is less than an hour qualifying rn and it’ll allow people to enjoy playing the track before it comes out.
Return of Flower Power - 2020

User avatar
Atom6246
Posts: 3888
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:28 am
Location: Florida
Contact:

Re: THE OFFICIAL MXS SX SERIES: 2020 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur) (NA)

Postby Atom6246 » Tue Mar 03, 2020 12:36 am

Snopro704 wrote:All it takes is one miracle send lap in this game

I can't believe how lucky the top 10, maybe even top 20 450 riders are. They've been doing it for 9 rounds already! Eventually their luck will run out tho....

right?

User avatar
Snopro704
Posts: 820
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:30 am

Re: THE OFFICIAL MXS SX SERIES: 2020 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur) (NA)

Postby Snopro704 » Thu Mar 05, 2020 3:34 am

Atom6246 wrote:
Snopro704 wrote:All it takes is one miracle send lap in this game

I can't believe how lucky the top 10, maybe even top 20 450 riders are. They've been doing it for 9 rounds already! Eventually their luck will run out tho....

right?


I'm talking the guys who are 25-45th every week.

Tonight further proved the lack of professionalism with the site being down and times locking in closer to 8:40. When it comes down to tenths of a second and people are getting bumped who would normally have gotten in then it's time to revisit the current format. 450 guys don't have to deal with TWENTY FIVE people in a server, and I think numbers have a lot to do with this problem being worsened. But it's not working, I can add Jeremy's own screenshotted words where he says times locked late, but then moves on as if I don't have the right to be peeved...?

If you've ever put effort into the pro scene you know how much of a motivation killer it is when you qualify but technical stuff on their end knocks out 5 or so deserving people who ran their lap in an hour unlike those who's servers restarted after 8:30. I started a thread awhile back trying to get clarification on when times locked, and tonight proves why they never answered me and still clearly don't have it under control.
Return of Flower Power - 2020

TheJuggernaut665
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2020 2:22 am
Team: Privateer

Re: THE OFFICIAL MXS SX SERIES: 2020 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur) (NA)

Postby TheJuggernaut665 » Sun Mar 08, 2020 5:39 am

Trying to get an rF C license for Novice. Can't find it on there website. Says the membership is free but then on their page I only see places where you buy knobbies. If someone could point me in the right direction, I would greatly appreciate it.

ThJuggernaut
Kyle Chandler
UID: 36858

User avatar
Jeremy150
Posts: 2075
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 9:56 am
Team: MV Films

Re: THE OFFICIAL MXS SX SERIES: 2020 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur) (NA)

Postby Jeremy150 » Sun Mar 08, 2020 8:38 am

Click on your name on the top right and this will pop up
Image
Image

User avatar
AWood
Posts: 4648
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:05 am
Team: Who Knows...
Location: Test Tracks and In N Out

Re: THE OFFICIAL MXS SX SERIES: 2020 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur) (NA)

Postby AWood » Tue Mar 10, 2020 6:35 am

Whoever is doing the protests needs to be publicly shamed for their terrible decisions.
barrington314 wrote:awood is right

Leclair wrote:My name is barking

Leclair wrote:i fuck you

2014 rF GNC 22nd Overall - 2014 rF 450 SX 12th - 2014 rF 450 MX 11th Overall
2013 rF GNC 17th Overall - 2013 rF 450 SX 17th - 2013 rF 450 MX 8th - 2013 EMF French Cup Open World 6th

User avatar
Ddavis
Posts: 17721
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:02 am
Location: California
Contact:

Re: THE OFFICIAL MXS SX SERIES: 2020 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur) (NA)

Postby Ddavis » Tue Mar 10, 2020 8:56 am

AWood wrote:Whoever is doing the protests needs to be publicly shamed for their terrible decisions.


The Burrell protest definitely wasn't "aggressive racing", thats the definition of a punt. I think the Lagerkvist and Hawkey situations could arguably just be "racing incidents". I don't know what the fuck Tyler is doing in his protest, but if that was me it'd be a week suspension or more. And the Bachlet protest was just him getting sketchy in those moguls I wouldn't dink him for that one.

User avatar
Jeremy150
Posts: 2075
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 9:56 am
Team: MV Films

Re: THE OFFICIAL MXS SX SERIES: 2020 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur) (NA)

Postby Jeremy150 » Tue Mar 10, 2020 9:47 pm

Burrell v Hawkey
IMO Burell should have surrendered the line to Hawkey, they were bar to bar going into that rut.

Parks v Burrell
Same corner but very different, because Burrell went right after him to make a hard pass. It could be looked at as an intentional punt, but we also view it as aggressive racing.

Spengler v Lagkervist
He very obviously was not going for a takeout, their lines came together.

Mitchell v Schmidt
Schmidt has been racing rF for a very long time and has no record of intentionally punting people. I think he just got caught up in trying to make it through the LCQ and made a terrible decision causing him to go off track and hit Roy.

DCope v Batchlett
Same situation as Parks v Burrell.
Image

User avatar
Triptez(Ethan Parks)
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 12:46 am
Team: Start Your Systems
Location: Idaho

Re: THE OFFICIAL MXS SX SERIES: 2020 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur) (NA)

Postby Triptez(Ethan Parks) » Tue Mar 10, 2020 11:47 pm

Jeremy150 wrote:
Parks v Burrell
Same corner but very different, because Burrell went right after him to make a hard pass. It could be looked at as an intentional punt, but we also view it as aggressive racing.


I feel like I should chime in. I agree with the verdict here. I'm one of those people that believe in warnings for minor stuff as we all make mistakes or do something aggressive in the moment. I also believe that people shouldn't get banned for one time offenses (unless its something extremely stupid) so its pretty rare for me to protest people. Unless people have a bad track record or just plain out being dumb, I think you guys made a good call. Now if he goes on and continues riding like an ass, that should def be a ban.

User avatar
FlyinHigh
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 12:37 am

Re: THE OFFICIAL MXS SX SERIES: 2020 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur) (NA)

Postby FlyinHigh » Wed Mar 11, 2020 5:22 pm

Jeremy150 wrote:DCope v Bachlet
Same situation as Parks v Burrell.


Yeah because his line was all the way to the tuf blocks I thought I had an opening to drive it up the inside. But then he cut over on me and I didn't have time to slow down unfortunately.
Image
Daniel Bachlet #86

Devin_Irwin
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2020 10:19 pm
Team: Privateer

Re: THE OFFICIAL MXS SX SERIES: 2020 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur) (NA)

Postby Devin_Irwin » Wed Mar 11, 2020 10:25 pm

I am trying to download the Indianapolis round 11 track but whenever I click on the link a "Runtime Error" pops up. Any suggestion? Please and Thanks.

User avatar
AWood
Posts: 4648
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:05 am
Team: Who Knows...
Location: Test Tracks and In N Out

Re: THE OFFICIAL MXS SX SERIES: 2020 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur) (NA)

Postby AWood » Thu Mar 12, 2020 1:29 am

Parks v Burrell Should be a week for a punt.

Schmidt should be a week

Bachlet should be a week.
barrington314 wrote:awood is right

Leclair wrote:My name is barking

Leclair wrote:i fuck you

2014 rF GNC 22nd Overall - 2014 rF 450 SX 12th - 2014 rF 450 MX 11th Overall
2013 rF GNC 17th Overall - 2013 rF 450 SX 17th - 2013 rF 450 MX 8th - 2013 EMF French Cup Open World 6th

User avatar
Ddavis
Posts: 17721
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:02 am
Location: California
Contact:

Re: THE OFFICIAL MXS SX SERIES: 2020 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur) (NA)

Postby Ddavis » Thu Mar 12, 2020 4:01 am

Wild night. I'm not sure if Walman ever saw it on discord... but I didn't mean to take him out when he was lapping me. I didn't anticipate him cutting the corner that short and I know he plays in 1st person so he never saw me. I should have just followed him to the outside.


Return to “Racing”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], VUSTTOS and 8 guests