Do you like racing Supercross with or without erode?

Organize races and post results here

Do you like racing Supercross with or without erode?

Yes, SX is fun with the erode
42
46%
No, SX is not fun with the erode
49
54%
 
Total votes: 91

User avatar
Triptez(Ethan Parks)
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 12:46 am
Team: Start Your Systems
Location: Idaho

Do you like racing Supercross with or without erode?

Postby Triptez(Ethan Parks) » Thu Jan 09, 2020 8:29 pm

It seems to be another big argument whether or not erode should be used for SUPERCROSS. I know that there has been a vote before, but it seemed to be a general overview of erode. So this one is your opinion of erode and SX.

USABMXER1
Posts: 1175
Joined: Sat Mar 28, 2015 2:49 am
Team: DaBaum Designs
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Contact:

Re: Do you like racing Supercross with or without erode?

Postby USABMXER1 » Fri Jan 10, 2020 11:51 am

I agree and disagree with erode in supercross. The reasons I disagree with erode in supercross is because it always forms that single line in just about every corner it seems like. But at the same time I do agree with having erode in supercross because it keeps the racing interesting. Track is always changing lap after lap, makes for better racing I personally think. Then on top of that it makes it so you always have to be on your toes and can't really just be coasting half the race knowing that the corner is going to be perfectly fine other than a downed rider in it every now and then and you have to actually hit it just right to get through the corner fast. But if you end up messing up the slightest bit from not getting into the rut properly or the rut is just to beat up it forces you to have to go and choose and or form a new line and hit the track differently than you have been making it more realistic than just being able to triple in every lap in every section without a problem at all. So that is my view point on erode in supercross, not entirely sure how many people are able to agree/disagree with the stuff that I have personally said. But I am actually wanting to hear other peoples thoughts on it as well, so put them out there boys.
WBG

User avatar
Whiteracing204
Posts: 214
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 11:44 pm
Team: W.W. Designs Private

Re: Do you like racing Supercross with or without erode?

Postby Whiteracing204 » Sun Jan 12, 2020 5:57 am

I like having erode on the track but i dont like how RF is changing the design of the track just to try and make erode work better because they are actually making the track harder to ride. They need to make the same amount of premade ruts and bumps as they did before, just turn the erode down and let the ruts form deeper and a little more rough as time goes on. I really want them to keep erode I just don't like how they change the track just to try and make erode work better

User avatar
BcMxKx37
Posts: 1491
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2013 5:20 am
Location: Costa Mesa, CA
Contact:

Re: Do you like racing Supercross with or without erode?

Postby BcMxKx37 » Mon Jan 13, 2020 9:29 pm

Whiteracing204 wrote:I like having erode on the track but i dont like how RF is changing the design of the track just to try and make erode work better because they are actually making the track harder to ride. They need to make the same amount of premade ruts and bumps as they did before, just turn the erode down and let the ruts form deeper and a little more rough as time goes on. I really want them to keep erode I just don't like how they change the track just to try and make erode work better


I agree with the first part, feel like the track is changing all around the erode but IMO, erode was most fun in 2018 with the big inside and outside ruts. may not be realism, but fun
Image


Return to “Racing”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests