2013 AMA Supercross Discussion
Re: 2013 AMA Supercross Discussion
KTM is in the right track, I would add that the rut in the whoops played just as big of a role in it all.
jlv wrote:Here's a picture of my nuts.
Re: 2013 AMA Supercross Discussion
wow great helmet cam footage.
Sucked to see a number of top riders down and out...I agree with the comment "who puts a whoop section after the first turn!?"
Felt like the track was pretty poorly designed. The placement of the sand section made little sense (because it was completely 1 lined), no interesting rhtyhms, and is it just me or were there 3 whoop sections?
Sucked to see a number of top riders down and out...I agree with the comment "who puts a whoop section after the first turn!?"
Felt like the track was pretty poorly designed. The placement of the sand section made little sense (because it was completely 1 lined), no interesting rhtyhms, and is it just me or were there 3 whoop sections?
DR.MIZ wrote: Keeping something "secret" so you can be "cool" is not making a flourishing community.
Re: 2013 AMA Supercross Discussion
Only two saki.
What is a safe obstacle for the first straight? Triple? Rhythm lane? Chicane? Tabletop? No matter what you put there they'll find a way to wreck on it.
What is a safe obstacle for the first straight? Triple? Rhythm lane? Chicane? Tabletop? No matter what you put there they'll find a way to wreck on it.
jlv wrote:Here's a picture of my nuts.
Re: 2013 AMA Supercross Discussion
I was thinking the same thing.
...make the tracks, let em race, if they crash they crash
...make the tracks, let em race, if they crash they crash
-
- Posts: 8361
- Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:52 am
- Team: Havoc Racing
- Contact:
Re: 2013 AMA Supercross Discussion
IDK how much you can hear your own bike during the scratch, but, I would want lower, simpler obstacles to start. I also don't know how confident they are without hearing the engine. Shift points are more muscle memory and timing I would guess than judgment of speed. Amazing there's not more pileups than that.
jlv wrote:If it weren't for Havoc I'd have been arguing with the 12 year olds by myself.
Re: 2013 AMA Supercross Discussion
What is lower and simpler than whoops on a SX track?
The roller before is silly, just gives them more space to get speed into them. Slower whoops are better, and you can built bigger without hurting the riders.
The roller before is silly, just gives them more space to get speed into them. Slower whoops are better, and you can built bigger without hurting the riders.
jlv wrote:Here's a picture of my nuts.
-
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 2:45 am
- Team: Ardent/TGphoto/Adept
- Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Re: 2013 AMA Supercross Discussion
I think an easier rhythm section is better than whoops, because with so many guys around you in a whoop section like that, you get sketchy and you will end up taking people down with you since everyone is packed in so close.
-
- Posts: 4132
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:20 pm
- Location: Washington, USA
- Contact:
Re: 2013 AMA Supercross Discussion
Joey Savatgy at Anaheim 2?The Conman wrote:I think an easier rhythm section is better than whoops
-
- Posts: 3880
- Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 1:26 pm
- Team: MXJP
- Location: Bushnell, Florida.
Re: 2013 AMA Supercross Discussion
The point is not naming which person did what in history/past. I think what most are saying in this case, is with Rhythm Sections you can at least switch up the section if you mis time something somehow. With whoops right after the start like that, everyone is so bunched up, one person get's a bit sketchy ( Reed ), it is a recipe for disaster. At the same token, I do agree. Make the tracks, let em race. They are pro's they should be able to handle it all. Just bad luck happens sometimes right?wheels1758 wrote:Joey Savatgy at Anaheim 2?The Conman wrote:I think an easier rhythm section is better than whoops
Re: 2013 AMA Supercross Discussion
Problem with this set of whoops was that they were so fast. Make them big and slow and you don't swap side so side so quickly.
Everyone thought the rhythm Savatgy caused the pile up in at A2 was easy and one lined...but....
Everyone thought the rhythm Savatgy caused the pile up in at A2 was easy and one lined...but....
jlv wrote:Here's a picture of my nuts.
Re: 2013 AMA Supercross Discussion
Tweeting this. That's too great.Ohagan75 wrote:[img]https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/ ... _n.jpg[img]
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 255 character limit.
-
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 1:55 am
- Team: JDR/J-Star/Ktm
- Location: Australia, Queensland
Re: 2013 AMA Supercross Discussion
Can anyone post a link for the 250 LCQ? i cant seem to find it
JDR/J-Star/KTM | 2012
#HatersGonnaHate
Real Life - http://www.facebook.com/jdrmotorsports
Real Life - http://www.jdrmotorsportsusa.com
MX Simulator - http://jdrjstarktm.webs.com/
Instagram - brayden_e44 FOLLOW ME
Re: 2013 AMA Supercross Discussion
Thank you Supercrossonline for providing fottage of practice's for us. But cmon, there are more teams than Geico, JDR and Monster on the track...