Numbers
For people who don't have a number. You can choose one here for 2017: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
Look to see what number is available between 100-999 and message me with your name and what number you have chosen. Once you have chosen your number you can't change it to a different number so think hard on what number you want.
You must have your name as followed - First Name Last Name | Team
For example - Jack Perry | JPD
Bloody amazing track. couldn't hold all the excitement in, kept telling the lads how great the sand section is and was really blown
away by his new and improved tables. The thought that must have gone into creating these intricate rhythm sections made me confident we will receive full gates this year. It didn't take Mr's Dunlop long to spread her legs for me providing a well lubed tunnel that increases speed efficiency
by 100%. All in all I've really got to take my hat off to perry this year A+ cunt
podium1 wrote:Bloody amazing track. couldn't hold all the excitement in, kept telling the lads how great the sand section is and was really blown
away by his new and improved tables. The thought that must have gone into creating these intricate rhythm sections made me confident we will receive full gates this year. It didn't take Mr's Dunlop long to spread her legs for me providing a well lubed tunnel that increases speed efficiency
by 100%. All in all I've really got to take my hat off to perry this year A+ cunt
I 100% can second this statement, very good track, makes me want to donate my life savings to track builder
Visually stunning and has a fun layout, but scaling is a bit too small. I'm not saying everything needs to be spaced out by 50 feet, but even a few clicks bigger would have helped (tighter than rF but similar to this scaling).
Ddavis wrote:Visually stunning and has a fun layout, but scaling is a bit too small. I'm not saying everything needs to be spaced out by 50 feet, but even a few clicks bigger would have helped (tighter than rF but similar to this scaling).
100% agree with this. It's just a shame that Perry hates other peoples feedback :/ btw round 2 is going to be scaled even smaller
I honestly think the scaling is perfect. It’s technical and takes skill to ride smooth. I wouldn’t enjoy this scaling in rf, but for aussx I think it’s sick. It’s a good way to differentiate this series from others and maybe get some more technical riders up front
Bryce#313 wrote:I honestly think the scaling is perfect. It’s technical and takes skill to ride smooth. I wouldn’t enjoy this scaling in rf, but for aussx I think it’s sick. It’s a good way to differentiate this series from others and maybe get some more technical riders up front
100% agree with this Look at the real life US Supercross vs the Aus Supercross. Australian tracks are a lot smaller/tighter and I think that was captured well here with this track. Well done =)
Bryce#313 wrote:I honestly think the scaling is perfect. It’s technical and takes skill to ride smooth. I wouldn’t enjoy this scaling in rf, but for aussx I think it’s sick. It’s a good way to differentiate this series from others and maybe get some more technical riders up front