RFG supercross question

Organize races and post results here
Whiteracing204
Posts: 117
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 11:44 pm
Team: Privateer

RFG supercross question

Postby Whiteracing204 » Mon Nov 20, 2017 2:53 am

I have a question for RFG sx and mx... can you race a 250 2 stroke in 250AMS
Walker White 403

User avatar
mx201
Posts: 1595
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 5:05 pm
Team: Architech
Location: London, Japan
Contact:

Re: RFG supercross question

Postby mx201 » Mon Nov 20, 2017 10:54 am

Who said there is gonna be rf Supercross :shock:
Logan "Indiana Jones" Leitzel
Image

User avatar
Atom6246
Posts: 3604
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:28 am
Location: Florida

Re: RFG supercross question

Postby Atom6246 » Mon Nov 20, 2017 11:37 am

mx201 wrote:Who said there is gonna be rf Supercross :shock:

Who said there is gonna be ams :shock:
Check out my Twitch channel by clicking the pic below!
Image

User avatar
motokid499
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:25 am
Team: Premium MotoSpodes
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: RFG supercross question

Postby motokid499 » Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:28 pm

My understanding is they are trying really hard to get erode to work well on supercross, and staff members aren't wanting to do non erode races when the feature is there so it might be erode or bust.
Tanner Rogers

User avatar
AHeckman2
Posts: 2522
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 12:11 am
Team: Start Your Systems
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:

Re: RFG supercross question

Postby AHeckman2 » Mon Nov 20, 2017 4:31 pm

I know at least one of the track creators isn’t coming back unless the kickers on the lips of jumps that form with erode are fixed. I hope they still host the series even if erode is a bust for this season.
Image

User avatar
Matias43_
Posts: 1173
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 5:38 am
Team: MV Films
Location: NJ
Contact:

Re: RFG supercross question

Postby Matias43_ » Mon Nov 20, 2017 5:26 pm

Erode sucks. Its gonna ruin racing atleast for sx, just my opinion
Image

User avatar
Matias43_
Posts: 1173
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 5:38 am
Team: MV Films
Location: NJ
Contact:

Re: RFG supercross question

Postby Matias43_ » Mon Nov 20, 2017 5:28 pm

Correction*** erode doesnt suck in general but after testing it out on sx on tracks and racing with people on it, it doesnt seem like a great idea. Random kickers that allow you to five into sections and stupid stuff like that. But erode in general is dope, i just dont think it should be brought into the sx racing scene
Image

garrettolver
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2016 8:42 pm
Team: MV Films

Re: RFG supercross question

Postby garrettolver » Mon Nov 20, 2017 5:35 pm

Whether they implement erode or not, I hope to see another year of sx. I personally, would give it more time until it is perfected or until we have the best understanding of how to use the feature to its full potential.
no supercross 2018=death of mxs
Image

User avatar
motokid499
Posts: 1383
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:25 am
Team: Premium MotoSpodes
Location: Canada
Contact:

Re: RFG supercross question

Postby motokid499 » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:04 pm

I think there needs to be some mach races with erode.
Tanner Rogers

Ddavis
Posts: 16874
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:02 am
Team: DX3 Suzuki
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: RFG supercross question

Postby Ddavis » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:27 pm

I think they should do Supercross without erode, then Outdoors with erode.
'13 7th [W] '14 6th [E] 9th [MX] '15 9th [MX] '16 11th [MX] '17 7th [SX/MX] '18 9th [MX]
#s 410 - 40 - 29 - 24 - 13 - 45 - 15 - 32*
NA 2 Podiums - 20 Top 5's - 97 Top 10's | Post 2018
EU 2015 450 Pro SX Main Event Win + Multiple Podiums

Cusano120
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 10:36 pm
Team: FFMX Racing
Location: NE Ohio

Re: RFG supercross question

Postby Cusano120 » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:50 pm

Ddavis wrote:I think they should do Supercross without erode, then Outdoors with erode.
Image

User avatar
AHeckman2
Posts: 2522
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 12:11 am
Team: Start Your Systems
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:

Re: RFG supercross question

Postby AHeckman2 » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:52 pm

Cusano120 wrote:
Ddavis wrote:I think they should do Supercross without erode, then Outdoors with erode.
Image

garrettolver
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2016 8:42 pm
Team: MV Films

Re: RFG supercross question

Postby garrettolver » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:56 pm

AHeckman2 wrote:
Cusano120 wrote:
Ddavis wrote:I think they should do Supercross without erode, then Outdoors with erode.
Image

RhysHarris
Posts: 323
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2017 8:12 pm
Team: FCA Offroad
Location: Orlando, Florida

Re: RFG supercross question

Postby RhysHarris » Mon Nov 20, 2017 6:59 pm

AHeckman2 wrote:
Cusano120 wrote:
Ddavis wrote:I think they should do Supercross without erode, then Outdoors with erode.
Image

Abear944
Posts: 131
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 12:35 am

Re: RFG supercross question

Postby Abear944 » Mon Nov 20, 2017 8:32 pm

Ddavis wrote:I think they should do Supercross without erode, then Outdoors with erode.
Image


Return to “Racing”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fro77, KaseoDip, Skouad and 6 guests