im doing what the holeshot device for the fork and shock is doing, but on sim you need to change setup cause your suspension dont comeback alone.rmitch524 wrote:But you do retune your suspension mid moto right?
Gotta love how people always bring real life into video games. Maybe our soldiers should just respawn when they get blown up too.
Would you rather race you WITH or WITHOUT erode ?
Re: Would you rather race you WITH or WITHOUT erode ?
1st 2014 Motosport Outdoor Nationals presented by One Industries
1st 2018 Race Tech North American Nationals
1st 2018 MotoOption Pro Supercross
1st 2019 MotoOption Pro National
1st 2018 Race Tech North American Nationals
1st 2018 MotoOption Pro Supercross
1st 2019 MotoOption Pro National
Re: Would you rather race you WITH or WITHOUT erode ?
How leghair be riding 24/7 very realisticskyzen wrote:im doing what the holeshot device for the fork and shock is doing, but on sim you need to change setup cause your suspension dont comeback alone.rmitch524 wrote:But you do retune your suspension mid moto right?
Gotta love how people always bring real life into video games. Maybe our soldiers should just respawn when they get blown up too.
-
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:08 pm
- Team: RockstarHusky
Re: Would you rather race you WITH or WITHOUT erode ?
I rather race without, because the ruts and such seems to be so strange with all of those people.
Re: Would you rather race you WITH or WITHOUT erode ?
Only reason I’m playing is Erode. Created a new challenge for a game I was a bit bored of after 3-4 years of playing. Not everyone is suppose to be good or fast, the game is a challenge. If you want something easier to play go play MVA/MXGP/Supercross on Xbox.
only one to win something real from the game!
-
- Posts: 1943
- Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2013 5:38 pm
- Team: Elevated Motorsports
Re: Would you rather race you WITH or WITHOUT erode ?
Depends. If we're playing without erode, make the tracks not available until right before the race to keep tryhards down.
With erode, release them whenever. The tracks change so it doesn't seem to matter.
With erode, release them whenever. The tracks change so it doesn't seem to matter.
TeamHavocRacing wrote:it's all the liberals fault
-
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 11:44 pm
- Team: W.W. Designs Private
Re: Would you rather race you WITH or WITHOUT erode ?
As of right now I hate erode. IF someone would make a few tweaks where the ruts wouldnt form so steep and maybe would push and blow out so eventually you would have to start a new line I would definitely like it alot better. The problem is, everyone hits the same line and I builds so high and steep it gets hard to hit because nobody starts a new line.
Re: Would you rather race you WITH or WITHOUT erode ?
So you wish the ruts would get to a point where they are slow/unrideable to force new lines, then complain that the ruts get too rough and hard to hit after it has been ridden a lot... I don't understand your logic. If your not changing your lines, that's all on you.Whiteracing204 wrote:As of right now I hate erode. IF someone would make a few tweaks where the ruts wouldnt form so steep and maybe would push and blow out so eventually you would have to start a new line I would definitely like it alot better. The problem is, everyone hits the same line and I builds so high and steep it gets hard to hit because nobody starts a new line.
Anyone see that inside rut that took out Seely and almost Tomac this past weekend? That thing was a damn wall!
-
- Posts: 858
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2015 3:57 pm
- Team: TM Factory Racing
- Location: Flädie, Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Would you rather race you WITH or WITHOUT erode ?
I belive the people who suggested more pre-built and less erode might be on the money.
Even the old style tracks that wasnt designed for erode would work great with a small amount of erode. Just enough to make the main lines dig out to the point where alternate lines starts getting reasonable to use.
Does less erode value have any effect on performance or is it just "erode:on" thats the performance hog no matter what value its set on?
Even the old style tracks that wasnt designed for erode would work great with a small amount of erode. Just enough to make the main lines dig out to the point where alternate lines starts getting reasonable to use.
Does less erode value have any effect on performance or is it just "erode:on" thats the performance hog no matter what value its set on?
-
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 11:44 pm
- Team: W.W. Designs Private
Re: Would you rather race you WITH or WITHOUT erode ?
What I am saying is I wish the erode would eventually push and blow out like ruts do after a little while in real life. As of right now though I'd rather have 80% premade 20% erode until there is a change in erode... Also, every time you change motos the track gets cleared of all the erode and then you jump back on a flat, slick track. In real life the ruts from the 250 class dont get taken out after the moto for the 450 class to have a smooth track. That could also be why everyone hits 1 line in the moto...aeffertz wrote:So you wish the ruts would get to a point where they are slow/unrideable to force new lines, then complain that the ruts get too rough and hard to hit after it has been ridden a lot... I don't understand your logic. If your not changing your lines, that's all on you.Whiteracing204 wrote:As of right now I hate erode. IF someone would make a few tweaks where the ruts wouldnt form so steep and maybe would push and blow out so eventually you would have to start a new line I would definitely like it alot better. The problem is, everyone hits the same line and I builds so high and steep it gets hard to hit because nobody starts a new line.
Anyone see that inside rut that took out Seely and almost Tomac this past weekend? That thing was a damn wall!
Re: Would you rather race you WITH or WITHOUT erode ?
128 votes isnt half the community, and barely scrapes all series sign ups.
Re: Would you rather race you WITH or WITHOUT erode ?
The 80%/20% geniuses don't realize that erode flattens premade bumps do they?
To whoever suggested dirt that actually moves and ruts that actually blow out... yea that would be epic. See if you can get JLV to implement that system, I'm sure the guys would love to make it work if it existed instead of molding concrete like it is currently.
To whoever suggested dirt that actually moves and ruts that actually blow out... yea that would be epic. See if you can get JLV to implement that system, I'm sure the guys would love to make it work if it existed instead of molding concrete like it is currently.
Re: Would you rather race you WITH or WITHOUT erode ?
Said the same thing myself when i watched it, wish you could quickly dab your foot like that in sim.aeffertz wrote:Anyone see that inside rut that took out Seely and almost Tomac this past weekend? That thing was a damn wall!
-
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2017 11:44 pm
- Team: W.W. Designs Private
Re: Would you rather race you WITH or WITHOUT erode ?
I think the main problem is when your in qualifying the track is so slick because there are no ruts to get in that you have to be in a server with 10-20 other people for the track to get good enough to turn a decent laptime. When it was all premade, you could go into a server with nobody in it and you would have the same track as the server with 40 people in it.
Re: Would you rather race you WITH or WITHOUT erode ?
Make a better game JLV. Your shit sucks
Re: Would you rather race you WITH or WITHOUT erode ?
Clearly it's because you're a way better rider than a Chase Sexton or Adam Cianciarulo.skyzen wrote: never take some random kickerz who gonna put me out of the track
Then again, pretty sure you've never ridden a national either...