Seperable Bike and Rider Models - Idea

Post anything about MX Simulator here. Please. I'm begging you.
yomo
Posts: 1930
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:00 am

Seperable Bike and Rider Models - Idea

Post by yomo »

Hey guys,

I've had an idea that would allow us to beable to seperate parts of models and basically having your own parts, able to be selected in game, similar to what they do on a basic level in MXvsATV untamed.

I know normal mapping is coming soon and with that a whole new set of models which JLV has said he would like to include imput from the modeling community.


Heres the Idea:

JLV, in accordance with some of the really good modelers (wakestyle, wilson, ddmx, DJ, Luiz, break etc etc etc... (sorry if i didnt include anyone)) create a "base template" for each of the bikes that are to be included in the "offical" game. This base template would inlclude the basic parts of a bike that are universal to most motocross bikes. (Swing arm, most of the engine, radiators, frame, plastics, suspension etc etc...). The base template would have various skins to choose from as it is currently run.

The parts of the bike that are often changed (or have a different skin) are left "open" with spefic dimensions that can be applied to any part. These would include: Exhaust, handel bars, engine components etc...

Example:
The base template of the bike would not include the entire exhaust system. Instead this is left off and the point where the exhaurst joins to the bike is marked and has known dimensions. Now any modeler can create a range of different exhurst systems which will easily all fit onto the original bike. These exhursts can be selected seperatly in the menus as they all fit perfectly onto the base bike model. Each exhurst can also have a unique skin so you wont need to release tonnes of complete bike skins to get the perfect combination

Stuff like chains, sprockets, engine components are all changed in real life. Instead of having a few skins which force people into having the exact same bike people can chose the component model and skin they want on there bike.


This theory can also be applied to the rider, with boots, chest protectors and neck braces all seperate and made to fit the original rider "base" model

I've just thought of the idea, so its obviosly not perfect. Its also really hard to explain so i'm sure ive left some people confused. I could do a few simple diagrams if people dont get it.

Anyway let me know if it sounds WAY to complicated but I dont think it would be, just needs some organisation.
Image
DJ99X
Posts: 15524
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:36 am
Location: Land Down Under

Re: Seperable Bike and Rider Models - Idea

Post by DJ99X »

Oh Yomo, you and your crazy ideas.
yomo
Posts: 1930
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:00 am

Re: Seperable Bike and Rider Models - Idea

Post by yomo »

Hahaha I always like to push the idea limits :D
Image
iceman967
Posts: 471
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 2:20 am
Team: Aggressive Graphix

Re: Seperable Bike and Rider Models - Idea

Post by iceman967 »

I think its a freakin great idea... the whole idea of "factory" teams will be a little easier to determine. But instead of leaving items out on the base model, why not make the base model staight up stock? then who ever knows how to model can model their own parts for it like clutch cover, handlebars, etc...

And to stretch yomo's limits, maybe add different dyno's for the different engine mods ;)
"Just don't lose... ever" (James "bubba" Stewart-The Great Outdoors: A Constant War)
yomo
Posts: 1930
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:00 am

Re: Seperable Bike and Rider Models - Idea

Post by yomo »

iceman967 wrote:And to stretch yomo's limits, maybe add different dyno's for the different engine mods ;)
Yeah I was going to include that, different performance for different parts.

If it was implemented that would be a definite possibility and would be so cool but JLV would need separate dyno runs for each part. And then a dyno run for how they impact on each other i presume.

Not sure exactly though, JLV is it possible?
Image
jlv
Site Admin
Posts: 15370
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 5:39 am
Team: No Frills Racing
Contact:

Re: Seperable Bike and Rider Models - Idea

Post by jlv »

If you wanted the dynos to be right you'd have to run every possible combination. Possible but very expensive.
Josh Vanderhoof
Sole Proprietor
jlv@mxsimulator.com
If you email, put "MX Simulator" in the subject to make sure it gets through my spam filter.
iceman967
Posts: 471
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 2:20 am
Team: Aggressive Graphix

Re: Seperable Bike and Rider Models - Idea

Post by iceman967 »

ya true. what about just dynos for exhausts? although even that could get tedious too... :/ still, the separate parts is a cool idea...
"Just don't lose... ever" (James "bubba" Stewart-The Great Outdoors: A Constant War)
hvpunk62
Posts: 2658
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:42 pm

Re: Seperable Bike and Rider Models - Idea

Post by hvpunk62 »

i say they dont have to be perfect just look at some pipe shootouts and estimate :wink:
mxracer118
Posts: 1723
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 8:58 pm

Re: Seperable Bike and Rider Models - Idea

Post by mxracer118 »

even if the dyno didn't change if the models could it would still be sick like goggles, exhaust, boots, leatt, bars stuff like that not little things just main parts that can change in real life.
Image
DJ99X wrote:Putting forum quotes in your signature is gay as fuck
JETZcorp
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 7:42 am
Team: Privateer
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Seperable Bike and Rider Models - Idea

Post by JETZcorp »

I think this is a great idea, IF we can get it well-incorporated into the UI. For me, this means we get an entire menu (within "bike setup" perhaps) dedicated to customizing parts. I'm sick of clicking the name of some skin and thinking, "I wonder what this is like?" and then going through each and every one I've installed in sequence. We need drop-downs, and we need rotatable previews of the bike and rider in 3D. Without that, I say it's too much for the current system to handle. It worked well when you were just choosing whether you wanted a YZ or a CRF, but now it's starting to get out of hand as the game and add-on community expand. Microsoft Flight Simulator 9 did a very good job with their interface for choosing airplane models and skins - even better than its sequel FSX.
Image
Give me more power.
Give me more handling.
Give me more style.
Give me more Maico.
Wilmx829
Posts: 819
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 5:47 pm
Team: Privateer
Contact:

Re: Seperable Bike and Rider Models - Idea

Post by Wilmx829 »

What's normal mapping?
TeamHavocRacing wrote:JLV is a risk-taking genuis pimp.
Image
yzmxer608
Posts: 15352
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:30 am
Team: SYS
Location: Wisconsin, U.S.A

Re: Seperable Bike and Rider Models - Idea

Post by yzmxer608 »

TeamHavocRacing wrote:If I had a nickel for every time someone asked for this, I would have a whole shitload of nickels.
yomo
Posts: 1930
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:00 am

Re: Seperable Bike and Rider Models - Idea

Post by yomo »

jlv wrote:If you wanted the dynos to be right you'd have to run every possible combination. Possible but very expensive.
Yeah I understand that but if this game goes huge it may be possible.

Is the general idea pluasible though? Or am i back the crazy idea drawing board :p
Image
jlv
Site Admin
Posts: 15370
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 5:39 am
Team: No Frills Racing
Contact:

Re: Seperable Bike and Rider Models - Idea

Post by jlv »

If I were to do something like that I'd probably make it an external application. Inside the game it's better to send a complete mesh to the video card.
Josh Vanderhoof
Sole Proprietor
jlv@mxsimulator.com
If you email, put "MX Simulator" in the subject to make sure it gets through my spam filter.
wheels1758
Posts: 4132
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 5:20 pm
Location: Washington, USA
Contact:

Re: Seperable Bike and Rider Models - Idea

Post by wheels1758 »

Is it possible to just break the skin up into diferent parts? So we would keep the bike model the same, but have the skin broken up into different sections? Does that make any sense?
Post Reply