2013 Zero MX

Post your suggestions here
Post Reply
DJ99X
Posts: 15523
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:36 am
Location: Land Down Under

2013 Zero MX

Post by DJ99X »

54 HP @ 4300 RPM (68 ft-lb), and weighs 265 lbs. That's all the data you need, right JLV? :lol: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Image

http://www.zeromotorcycles.com/2013/



Seriously though, that bike is starting to get pretty good. Suspension and chassis is still way behind a proper bike, and cost is 12k in the US. I'd love to have a go on one though. Or test one out in a game.... :)
DJ99X
Posts: 15523
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:36 am
Location: Land Down Under

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by DJ99X »

And holy shit that's a big rear sprocket
Robert196
Posts: 3408
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:50 pm
Location: 192.168. 1.1

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by Robert196 »

I wonder how many people opened this topic and thought it was a model for the game and DJ just posted in the wrong section. :lol:
| 2013 MotoOption Supercross 250 Eastside Champion | #turnbarcrew |
Mona
Posts: 1645
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:46 pm
Team: MotoOption

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by Mona »

http://www.zeromotorcycles.com/2013/ wrote:Typical cost to recharge $0.30
Beats gas prices by a little...
BrutalMX
Posts: 1061
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 7:38 am
Location: PA
Contact:

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by BrutalMX »

Damn, weird you brought this up! I actually got to ride one of these at a local shop as a "show" at an expo kinda thing and got paid for the day as if I worked for the shop...was a win win for me haha. It was like 2 years ago though, looked much different.
Image

It actually didnt feel too bad. The worse part about it I thought were the brakes. Throttle response is AWESOME, the power is right there and it feels way different than anything I've ever ridden because its so instant..but I liked it. I remember thinking give it another 5 years and these things will start catching on.

I have a photo from the day I rode it somewhere, lemme see if I can find it.
Austin Mulhern | Motopixels REV
Image[/a]
[url=http://www.youtube.com/paprod]YouTube Channel

p2sta wrote:since your name is CRF450R you should not worry about kawasaki :lol:
DJ99X
Posts: 15523
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:36 am
Location: Land Down Under

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by DJ99X »

Yeah, those ones were only like 20 HP or something. 54 HP would be absolutely nuts!
BrutalMX
Posts: 1061
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 7:38 am
Location: PA
Contact:

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by BrutalMX »

DJ99X wrote:Yeah, those ones were only like 20 HP or something. 54 HP would be absolutely nuts!
Yeh I know, I forgot to mention that the 30+ HP increase is probably insane! I remember the rep telling me the only bad part about them is the battery; they only have a certain guaranteed amount of charging cycles or something like that, and also the batteries are wayyy expensive so having multiple on-hand pretty much isn't possible unless you just won the lottery haha
Austin Mulhern | Motopixels REV
Image[/a]
[url=http://www.youtube.com/paprod]YouTube Channel

p2sta wrote:since your name is CRF450R you should not worry about kawasaki :lol:
DJ99X
Posts: 15523
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:36 am
Location: Land Down Under

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by DJ99X »

The website says you get 1600 hours of use out of the battery before the capacity drops below 80% of its max capacity. Which isn't bad at all.
JTmoto
Crushed Dissenter
Posts: 485
Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 2:06 am
Team: Eleven10 Mods Suzuki

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by JTmoto »

DJ99X wrote:The website says you get 1600 hours of use out of the battery before the capacity drops below 80% of its max capacity. Which isn't bad at all.
Yea holy shit that's a damn long time! I can see a problem with re-sale though. Why would you buy a used one that you will have to buy a new battery for when you could get a new one for not to much more...
Image
Pumaxcs
Posts: 13208
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:50 pm
Team: Kyle/Luiz
Location: Western, Kentucky

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by Pumaxcs »

Maybe its just me but it will be a long ass time before I put 1000 hours into a motor. It doesn't see, like you will need to buy a new battery and I imagine used prices would be pretty high but the only way to know a resale is how much better the new year models are.
Image
Everytime you post something stupid, a baby gets punched in the face. Please be smart, for the children.
MXS Cares
jlv wrote: Thu Nov 05, 2020 1:09 am Pumaxcs would know better than I do.
DJ99X
Posts: 15523
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:36 am
Location: Land Down Under

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by DJ99X »

Yeah, resale wouldn't be all that good at first; the technology is improving too rapidly
mxrewind665
Posts: 2600
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 4:12 pm
Team: FlowTech
Location: New England USA
Contact:

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by mxrewind665 »

MOTORSPORS!!!! :lol:
Image
mxrewind665
Posts: 2600
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 4:12 pm
Team: FlowTech
Location: New England USA
Contact:

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by mxrewind665 »

mxrewind665 wrote:MOTORSPORTS!!!! :lol:
Image
Andy_Hack
Posts: 2443
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:47 am
Team: SplitFire
Location: Germany/Bavaria
Contact:

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by Andy_Hack »

these bikes are a good idea IMO, but I just cant imagine missing the sounds of a motor.
its kinda funny, all people and magazines write: "It has so much torque!" :lol: I dont wonder dudes, that chainwheel is huge! :lol:
wonder if we had to put 2 chains together to get more lenght :mrgreen:
*fancy signature*
d4u5d6u7 wrote:good staff, nice skins, like
DJ99X
Posts: 15523
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 11:36 am
Location: Land Down Under

Re: 2013 Zero MX

Post by DJ99X »

The rear sprocket is that big because the bike doesn't have an internal gearbox like a combustion bike.

Also, they do make sound. Sounds like a quiet turbine

Post Reply