2015 MotoSport rF National Round 5: High Point

[craigmx37]

awood, or negative nancy?[quote][/quote]

[mxsrider96]

awood, or teenage girl on period?

FTFY

[Racers52]

Too many cheater lines, fucked up timing gates, and 5th wide quads for me to have fun. the rhythm section has an inside double, and a outside quad (you can 5 it on a 450). Pretty good for racing. Washougal sucks already in my opinion but please dont touch it

its funny because I haven't seen, or heard you volunteer to help out. You were not there with us at 1-2am trying to get the track race-able. Yeah the track is rushed, yes it can be better but you bitching doesn't change anything. You are just setting the example of "that community member" that people talk about with the negativity.

[AWood]

Ahh I get it. That's just because race used the old overlay for decals and not the map that was built off. The one built off wasn't available.

The old layout yfmx had to wing a bit because it was before the time of quality overlays.

None of this makes any sense at all. Like, 0 sense. in the world.

yFMX overlay may be barely off a perfect satellite image, but this track is WAY off the sat image.


Can you explain a few things:
Why is some of the finish straight, behind the finish, the start, and the first turn Perfectly on the overlay, or decently close, but then there are sections like the old triple up and u turn after the new triple uphill.

How do you just move the corner like 50 feet over, its built off an overlay. The turn doesnt move when they use the same one.


Or how to turning double just moves, or the section after it.


I know there arent many reference pictures for the middle section, but there are some. So i dont understand the "just wing it" approach, if there's no attempt at doing an accurate job, why do it at all?


Also, yFMX's overlay, is nearly perfect with a brand new sat image. The only part off is half of the uphill and the left before the finish.


If we want a good base for next year, use the old layout thats built off an excellent overlay or use the new sat images. This one is nowhere close.


IMO this is where this track belongs.



And race, i voiced my opinion whenever i can, have always tried to provide help and feedback, its funny because whenever a good track is released theres like, nobody bitching. theres obviously something wrong with this one.

And hit me up, ill help out, ive messages chris before in skype or offered other places to multiple people with no replies. where else am i supposed to offer myself up? My opinion, if a tracks new, cool, make it, if its not done. dont rush, and force it. Just revert to an old one with 100 hours spent on it, not 3

[mxer164]

The track might be a little off, but I live near High Point and have had the opportunity to ride the new layout. Great representation of the new layout!

[wheels1758]

If youre busy with with work dont half ass sim tracks and make them shitty as fuck

I don't have a problem with you sitting out this round.

[Yamahaman95]

If youre busy with with work dont half ass sim tracks and make them shitty as fuck

And you wonder why no one will reply to you trying to help. I have a feeling you would be a nightmare to work with. But that's only a guess. And to be honest....i think I'll make Washougal really shitty...then have everyone put in bets on what you will say on the post...i think that'd be fun.

[mxsrider96]

He bitches about how the track is horrible and half assed, but it was apparently good enough for him to qualify in the top 5 for the first time all season and in the top 10 for the first time since Hangtown. But, hey...

[beast 519]

http://www.twitch.tv/awood729 come watch awood be bent

[AWood]

If youre busy with with work dont half ass sim tracks and make them shitty as fuck

I don't have a problem with you sitting out this round.

I agree it was harsh comment but id rather not sit out a round ive qualy 4th for because of comments made about the track

If youre busy with with work dont half ass sim tracks and make them shitty as fuck

And you wonder why no one will reply to you trying to help. I have a feeling you would be a nightmare to work with. But that's only a guess. And to be honest....i think I'll make Washougal really shitty...then have everyone put in bets on what you will say on the post...i think that'd be fun.

Im not the only one saying that stuff. just the only one who will post it

[wheels1758]

He bitches about how the track is horrible and half assed, but it was apparently good enough for him to qualify in the top 5 for the first time all season and in the top 10 for the first time since Hangtown. But, hey...

Ehh, he probably cut the track...

[wheels1758]

If youre busy with with work dont half ass sim tracks and make them shitty as fuck

I don't have a problem with you sitting out this round.

I agree it was harsh comment but id rather not sit out a round ive qualy 4th for because of comments made about the track

And if we used last year's track, you'd complain that it is shitty that we can't build a new track and we are racing on something old.

[barrington314]

maybe he used all the cheater lines this week.

Plus no root or fresqueeze

[AWood]

And if we used last year's track, you'd complain that it is shitty that we can't build a new track and we are racing on something old.

I dont think anyones use the cuts in qualifying or theyd be way faster times. And you know i wouldnt complain about an old track. i know how much work goes into a quality track.

Also, If i used all the cuts on this track id be well into a 49 or lower.

Anyways, idk why YOU'RE so against me for track comments. where i can understand Chris or Race. I feel bad for Race though trying to do all he could.

[wheels1758]

Anyways, idk why YOU'RE so against me for track comments. where i can understand Chris or Race. I feel bad for Race though trying to do all he could.

I'm not against you for track comments.

I'm against you for telling the guys who worked hard on this track that they suck, when you're offering no help to update tracks. The only thing you'll offer is "feedback", and that's not what we need.