Re: Moon Hoaxers, Flat Earthers and 9/11 Conspiracies
Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2018 4:32 pm
This is hilarious thanks for sharingmodel_90 wrote:Zoa's people
I like to think the thumbnail for this video is a picture of Zoa
Just practice more!
https://forum.mxsimulator.com/
This is hilarious thanks for sharingmodel_90 wrote:Zoa's people
I like to think the thumbnail for this video is a picture of Zoa
pretty sure it was Tapia. lol. It was a text exchange that they posted pics of also.yzmxer608 wrote:Who did I hear about on Pulp that thinks the earth is flat?
Tapia or Raper I can't remember but someone like thatbarrington314 wrote:pretty sure it was Tapia. lol. It was a text exchange that they posted pics of also.yzmxer608 wrote:Who did I hear about on Pulp that thinks the earth is flat?
Just to play devil's advocate, could it not have been something like this?TeamHavocRacing wrote:How could they possibly fit this shot in a studio?
broland278 wrote:I actually find this thread very interesting
We found the one thing you and I can agree on.TeamHavocRacing wrote:I think it was Clason. Don't quote me though. Prolly Ping too, that whacknut.
Rush and Zoa are giving me a good cross-section of how poorly educated today's kids are.
Rush, you do know there is a film of the JFK assassination, don't you? The first shot came from the fence on the grassy knoll and hit him in the throat, which hits his spinal column, partially paralyzing JFK and causing him to reach for his throat with his balled fists, not grasping hands. The other shots come from other places until the headshot from the front which causes his head to fly back. Obviously the first and last shots came from the front. Guy in the front seat? You crackhead! Speculate about the rest, but Jackie jumped onto the trunk to retrieve a piece of his skull. JFK and RFK had every wing of the military and intelligence communities after them, so the mob was just used as muscle, not the whole job.
Zoa, what's the logic behind faking only the first landing? Why even risk any mission when you can fake all of them? What are you? On meth? Hoaxers usually claim that the Van Allen belts are too strong for a human to pass through and survive. Actually that's the cornerstone of their case.
That's good enough to fool casual observers but it wouldn't hold up under real analysis. The difference in focus would be a dead giveaway.barrington314 wrote:Just to play devil's advocate, could it not have been something like this?TeamHavocRacing wrote:How could they possibly fit this shot in a studio?
Forced perspective.
https://diyscifi.files.wordpress.com/20 ... ective.jpg
https://museumderillusionen.at/wp-conte ... lusion.jpg