6d helmets.

I've heard conversation coming out of animal pens that is more intelligent than what is going on in here.
Phathry25
Posts: 7481
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:09 am
Team: No Frills Racing
Location: WI
Contact:

Re: 6d helmets.

Post by Phathry25 »

You don't believe my 6D story?

It's amazing that you still don't understand what hearsay is after all this.
MiNi
Posts: 990
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:01 pm
Location: Canada

Re: 6d helmets.

Post by MiNi »

Phathry25 wrote:You don't believe my 6D story?

It's amazing that you still don't understand what hearsay is after all this.
hear·say
ˈhi(ə)rˌsā/Submit
noun
1.
"information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor."

lol I don't believe everything I hear. While it is hearsay, that doesn't mean that hearsay can't be accurate. I chose to believe this because it makes sense. Read the rest of my posts FFS! Jesus.

It baffles me to know I have to keep repeating my shit to get the point across. I would kindly ask that you pull your head out of your ass already. :wink:
Phathry25 wrote:Don't try to apply logic to anything mini says. That's where you went wrong.
KTM57 wrote:Total keyboard warrior.
760Liam
Posts: 1404
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 5:33 pm
Location: California

Re: 6d helmets.

Post by 760Liam »

MiNi wrote:It baffles me to know I have to keep repeating my shit to get the point across.
I bet Phat feels the same way with you...
Image
MiNi
Posts: 990
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:01 pm
Location: Canada

Re: 6d helmets.

Post by MiNi »

760Liam wrote:I bet Phat feels the same way with you...
I never said you had to believe me. I never said you had to take your leatt off and I never said you were an idiot for wearing one. I'm just saying what I know. Read my posts. If you have already, re-read my posts.
Phathry25 wrote:Don't try to apply logic to anything mini says. That's where you went wrong.
KTM57 wrote:Total keyboard warrior.
Phathry25
Posts: 7481
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:09 am
Team: No Frills Racing
Location: WI
Contact:

Re: 6d helmets.

Post by Phathry25 »

Don't you mean you're just saying what you've heard?
MiNi
Posts: 990
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:01 pm
Location: Canada

Re: 6d helmets.

Post by MiNi »

LOL
MiNi wrote:Here is the short version:

Non-hearsay: Believe it or not, neck braces haven't actually been proven anywhere.
Non-hearsay: The public assumed that they work, because it hasn't been done before.
Non-hearsay: Pictures don't prove the leatt works.
Non-hearsay: Many riders are taking theirs off all of a sudden. Not a few, many.
Hearsay: Hearing the Langston story, it makes sense.
Based on what I know, what I've heard makes sense. I'll say it again; you don't have to believe me.
Phathry25 wrote:Don't try to apply logic to anything mini says. That's where you went wrong.
KTM57 wrote:Total keyboard warrior.
Phathry25
Posts: 7481
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:09 am
Team: No Frills Racing
Location: WI
Contact:

Re: 6d helmets.

Post by Phathry25 »

I find it extremely hard to believe that Leatt was able to secure investors by not being able to prove his brace worked in some capacity.

Seriously, imagine a contestant on shark tank or whatever that investment show is saying I have this safety device, I have proven it to not be effective at all in doing what I claim it to do, but I think I can fool people well enough to make millions off of it. And then getting the investors to bite.

Seems ludicrous right?

Or how about alpinestars doing all this research to prove that their brace also isn't worth shit, but still pouring money into designing, building and marketing it.

Equally ludicrous.
MiNi
Posts: 990
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:01 pm
Location: Canada

Re: 6d helmets.

Post by MiNi »

Phathry25 wrote:I find it extremely hard to believe that Leatt was able to secure investors by not being able to prove his brace worked in some capacity.

Seriously, imagine a contestant on shark tank or whatever that investment show is saying I have this safety device, I have proven it to not be effective at all in doing what I claim it to do, but I think I can fool people well enough to make millions off of it. And then getting the investors to bite.

Seems ludicrous right?

Or how about alpinestars doing all this research to prove that their brace also isn't worth shit, but still pouring money into designing, building and marketing it.

Equally ludicrous.
The leatt and its design appeared to be genius. Everyone agreed that it was amazing; it got product of the decade by Racer X if I can recall. I bought into it, my whole family bought into it and all of my friends bought into it.

That's the thing though, none of use have a clue about what was said to those investors. But don't you think that there might be something odd if leatt wants to keep the stats for their brace private? Sure leatt has released numbers on the internet, but those numbers won't always be true numbers. As long as percentages are between 0.1% and 99.9%, anything can be made up. Nobody knows what percentages the investors are given, or if they were given any percentages at all and they just saw an opportunity to make bank. I'm sure you're aware that investors don't care much for the product but they care if they will make money at it.

Because Alpinestars can make a lot of money off of it, that's why. For an investor, it would be stupid not to invest because people already believe in the technology and people will buy it, regardless. Also, maybe Alpinestars will keep the product and keep innovating it because they have interest in it and want to see it turn out for the better. You might even be able to say the same about the new Atlas brace (which I am very interested in).

Who knows? Its only speculation of course. But it is a very interesting issue, indeed. Hell, you could call it a mystery if you wanted to.
Phathry25 wrote:Don't try to apply logic to anything mini says. That's where you went wrong.
KTM57 wrote:Total keyboard warrior.
supercross711
Posts: 3032
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:15 pm
Location: North Carolina USA

Re: 6d helmets.

Post by supercross711 »

This fight will go down in history.
Image
P2sta wrote:Read it again, you are going full are going full 'meurican here.
Lynch
Posts: 1441
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 6:49 pm
Team: Atlas Technologies
Location: Sweden

Re: 6d helmets.

Post by Lynch »

Hope Phat wins.
760Liam
Posts: 1404
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 5:33 pm
Location: California

Re: 6d helmets.

Post by 760Liam »

Lynch wrote:Hope Phat wins.
Image
supercross711
Posts: 3032
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:15 pm
Location: North Carolina USA

Re: 6d helmets.

Post by supercross711 »

Im kinda routing for MINI even though i haven't read a word they have said.
Image
P2sta wrote:Read it again, you are going full are going full 'meurican here.
MiNi
Posts: 990
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 9:01 pm
Location: Canada

Re: 6d helmets.

Post by MiNi »

760Liam wrote:
Lynch wrote:Hope Phat wins.
You honestly think that there's something to win in all of this? There's nothing to win and I'm not in this to win anything. The argument is at an impasse anyway.
supercross711 wrote:Im kinda routing for MINI even though i haven't read a word they have said.
Don't bother lol, its just a stupid argument. Save yourself the trouble.
Phathry25 wrote:Don't try to apply logic to anything mini says. That's where you went wrong.
KTM57 wrote:Total keyboard warrior.
Del
Posts: 187
Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 10:10 pm
Team: Dubmoto

Re: 6d helmets.

Post by Del »

MiNi wrote:The funny thing is that you openly admitted to accepting hearsay from a doctor. A doctor could feed you the biggest bullshit ever, you would believe it...
Evo997
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 9:23 pm
Team: Privateer

Re: 6d helmets.

Post by Evo997 »

Look at this picture, this is how your vertebrae move. There are three main ways to break a neck, twist, bend, compress. The two that get addressed by a neck brace are bend, and twist to a lesser degree. Obviously, getting landed on like Trey Canard in 2012 is a compression, and a neck brace will do next to nothing, but maybe a little help because his neck wouldn't have been bent as far over exposing more vertebrae. To be 100% effective would have to be overly restricting. A Leatt is designed to keep your head from moving too far from the original position. Anyone who has worn one understands. It's simple science and the picture alone should let you come to the conclusion yourself. Bend the vertebrae too far in either direction and they fracture.

Image

Saying they do nothing is absolutely ridiculous. Companies would not be investing money and time into making a product better if it didn't work. They'd do what most cheap companies do, make it and say it's perfect; never touching it again. People break their necks, it happens. Majority is a compression, either head first into something or landed on. A neck brace can't help with that. In reality though, it's better to be landed on than have your neck snapped from it getting bent back.
Prada wrote:I spent 5 minutes plunging my toilet today.
Phathry25 wrote:Don't try to apply logic to anything MiNi says.
Post Reply