Page 1 of 1
What is better (not more reliable)
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 3:46 am
by mxrewind665
What is better Honda or Suzuki 250fs? Not reliable wise riding wise.
Re: What is better (not more reliable)
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 3:47 am
by pinit24/7#12
Depends. What are the years of the bikes?
Re: What is better (not more reliable)
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 3:49 am
by mxrewind665
2011-13
Re: What is better (not more reliable)
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 3:50 am
by LiL Bubba
Zook.
Re: What is better (not more reliable)
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 3:51 am
by rideblue56
mxrewind665 wrote:What is better Honda or Suzuki 250fs? Not reliable wise riding wise.
You realize youre asking people a very opinionated question right? Its all about what you think is better. If you buy a bike because someone else said its good, and youve never once tried it, or any of the oter bikes, youre an idiot.
Re: What is better (not more reliable)
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 3:51 am
by honda boy 326
when it comes to witch bike rides better its not the machine anymore its the rider and how he feels on the bike.
BUT hondas are more reliable
Re: What is better (not more reliable)
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:00 am
by mxrewind665
rideblue56 wrote:mxrewind665 wrote:What is better Honda or Suzuki 250fs? Not reliable wise riding wise.
You realize youre asking people a very opinionated question right? Its all about what you think is better. If you buy a bike because someone else said its good, and youve never once tried it, or any of the oter bikes, youre an idiot.
Good point but im talking dynos and technical stuff.
Re: What is better (not more reliable)
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:21 am
by DK662
There both great bikes. If I had to choose between the two I would go for the one I could get the best deal on.
Technical specs don't mean shit on bikes that are in the same class. It's all preference.
Re: What is better (not more reliable)
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:21 am
by TH_722
KTM.
Re: What is better (not more reliable)
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:23 am
by The Conman
Well you see here, my Dad is a mechanic, and he always says his favorite bike to work on is a Honda, because it's the easiest to him.
So yeah, I don't know.
Re: What is better (not more reliable)
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:26 am
by mxrewind665
my dad is as well he said kawi honda and zukis are all the best to do.
Re: What is better (not more reliable)
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:12 am
by Phathry25
As far as casting and fastener quality goes Honda and Yamaha are better than Kawasaki and Suzuki.
If you're not worried about reliability, why not just read the published bike shootouts from the years in question?
Re: What is better (not more reliable)
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:14 am
by Pumaxcs
My Dad was a mechanic in his day and he has chosen Kawi's and he had a Suzuki that he didn't like. I would go with the Honda. For what your looking for in dyno's, there is no faster bike than the Kawi but, out of your options I'd choose the Honda.