Page 2063 of 2063

Re: MXS Twitter

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2022 3:43 pm
by TeamHavocRacing
jlv wrote: Thu Jan 06, 2022 1:37 am https://iss-sim.spacex.com/
Thanks for sharing such cool stuff! I had endless fun with that WebGl demo from years ago! My problem with docking was not seeing the Z translation controls nor the Roll controls. You have to click in the empty space they occupy since they're hidden until then, otherwise it's a matter of patient flying. It's like chasing elevator and aileron trim during flying while managing your energy states. Once I found all the controls I realized a complete non-pilot could manage it with patience.

Re: MXS Twitter

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2022 1:29 am
by jlv
TeamHavocRacing wrote: Tue Jan 11, 2022 3:43 pm Thanks for sharing such cool stuff! I had endless fun with that WebGl demo from years ago! My problem with docking was not seeing the Z translation controls nor the Roll controls. You have to click in the empty space they occupy since they're hidden until then, otherwise it's a matter of patient flying. It's like chasing elevator and aileron trim during flying while managing your energy states. Once I found all the controls I realized a complete non-pilot could manage it with patience.
It's dumb that they hide some of the controls like that. I noticed you can just use the keyboard wasd+qe for translation and arrows+<> for rotation.

Re: MXS Twitter

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2022 1:47 am
by m121c

Re: MXS Twitter

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2022 2:46 pm
by Pumaxcs
I almost peed my pants laughing that an "UNCLASSIFIED" document header would then have a "(top secret) share drive address" also included in it.

Good share, thanks. :lol:

Re: MXS Twitter

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2022 3:18 pm
by m121c
Pumaxcs wrote: Wed Jan 12, 2022 2:46 pm I almost peed my pants laughing that an "UNCLASSIFIED" document header would then have a "(top secret) share drive address" also included in it.

Good share, thanks. :lol:
This was meant for politics thread, my mistake.

It is very odd indeed, something isn’t right. Either by the whistleblower, PV, or this was a mistake of classification.

The only thing about it is Fauci didn’t proclaim the documents as false, rather his response seemingly verifies that DARPA did in fact reject this grant, but he claims that the NIH did as well. So where is the truth? Was this military document falsely constructed to paint a picture? Or was the picture already painted?

Food for thought is all, this should spill over to the debate thread though, again my mistake!

Re: MXS Twitter

Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 2:41 am
by jlv
Did they steal that from The Onion?

Re: MXS Twitter

Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 3:24 am
by m121c
Who knows, doesn’t really matter, people will choose their truth.

Re: MXS Twitter

Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2022 4:37 pm
by TeamHavocRacing
*Alternate facts.