Page 1 of 1

Irony

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:58 am
by Phathry25
Does anyone else see the irony in the two stroke blowing up and not the shitty valve eating 4 strokes? :roll:

http://www.vitalmx.com/photos/features/ ... 81/GuyB,64

Re: Irony

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:36 am
by DJ99X
Oh the sweet ironing

Re: Irony

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 4:40 am
by JETZcorp
They ran that two-stroke at 200:1 and brought it up to 55 horsepower, what did you expect? Also, unlike the big factory four-strokes, that team didn't have the budget to prepare ten fully-tuned motors for race day, so they've been on the same motor not only for all of the races, but all of their practicing as well. I'll bet you any money that James Stewart's engine had a fraction of the hours that one did.

Re: Irony

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:20 am
by tyskorn
Image

Re: Irony

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:09 pm
by jlv
JETZcorp wrote:They ran that two-stroke at 200:1 and brought it up to 55 horsepower, what did you expect? Also, unlike the big factory four-strokes, that team didn't have the budget to prepare ten fully-tuned motors for race day, so they've been on the same motor not only for all of the races, but all of their practicing as well. I'll bet you any money that James Stewart's engine had a fraction of the hours that one did.
James Stewart's engine is a bad example.


Re: Irony

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 4:45 am
by JETZcorp
Looks like a pretty good example to me. :P