Upcoming Tracks and Track Objects #2

DJ99X · Post by **DJ99X** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:35 am

Too close to track edge, unless you are using a stadium

Jones221 · Post by **Jones221** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:41 am

ehh your opinion means nothing to me jk

borderpatrol199 · Post by **borderpatrol199** » Wed Mar 17, 2010 3:00 am

Looks pretty cool jonesy....

jesplind · Post by **jesplind** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:54 pm

Bad quality

Duckstream · Post by **Duckstream** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:57 pm

that looks good as hell!
when we se that

i like deserts and sand.. hope thats some sort of sand terrain? :S

FactoryBR21 · Post by **FactoryBR21** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:16 pm

Looks pretty good ! Scale seems a bit large , not bad though
want me to test it ?

Duckstream · Post by **Duckstream** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:29 pm

want us

Wilson · Post by **Wilson** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:42 pm

I think you could make the sky and the textures blend together alot better.

ddmx · Post by **ddmx** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:17 pm

Like wilson said, the lighting of the ground should match the lighting of the skybox. Right now the sky is really dark and the ground is really daylit.

Mbutler183 · Post by **Mbutler183** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:20 pm

Regardless of the lighting errors that track looks incredible!

ddmx · Post by **ddmx** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:26 pm

Mbutler183 wrote:Regardless of the lighting errors that track looks incredible!

Beg to differ. With the lighting inconsistencies and the lackadaisical textures it is a mediocre track. With those two issues fixed it's a decent track. Cypress is an incredible track. Our standards for tracks are too extremely low because the physics make even the shattiest track seem, "incredible".

Mbutler183 · Post by **Mbutler183** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:27 pm

ddmx wrote:
Mbutler183 wrote:Regardless of the lighting errors that track looks incredible!
Beg to differ. With the lighting inconsistencies and the lackadaisical textures it is a mediocre track. With those two issues fixed it's a decent track. Cypress is an incredible track. Our standards for tracks are too extremely low because the physics make even the shattiest track seem, "incredible".

Did you just make that word up? lol

ddmx · Post by **ddmx** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:32 pm

Are you serious?
lack·a·dai·si·cal – adjective
1.
without interest, vigor, or determination; listless; lethargic: a lackadaisical attempt.
2.
lazy; indolent: a lackadaisical fellow.

Mbutler183 · Post by **Mbutler183** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:34 pm

ddmx wrote:Are you serious?
lack·a·dai·si·cal – adjective
1.
without interest, vigor, or determination; listless; lethargic: a lackadaisical attempt.
2.
lazy; indolent: a lackadaisical fellow.

I was serious, thanks for making me look dumb.

ddmx · Post by **ddmx** » Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:36 pm

No probs dude, always here to help out!

Upcoming Tracks and Track Objects #2

Re: Upcoming Tracks #2

Re: Upcoming Tracks #2

Re: Upcoming Tracks #2

Re: Upcoming Tracks #2

Re: Upcoming Tracks #2

Re: Upcoming Tracks #2

Re: Upcoming Tracks #2

Re: Upcoming Tracks #2

Re: Upcoming Tracks #2

Re: Upcoming Tracks #2

Re: Upcoming Tracks #2

Re: Upcoming Tracks #2

Re: Upcoming Tracks #2

Re: Upcoming Tracks #2

Re: Upcoming Tracks #2