Game Suggestions

[rideblue56]

well it wouldnt be. but is it possible to make a person go no collision after a certain amount of time behind the leader? that would make it so the lappers cant battle with the leader or get in the way and make the people that free ride less of a problem during racing too.

[Redbull]

Well when people are playing thousands of miles away and are laggy and they can hit you without even touching you is that realistic? No

[Redbull]

well it wouldnt be. but is it possible to make a person go no collision after a certain amount of time behind the leader? that would make it so the lappers cant battle with the leader or get in the way and make the people that free ride less of a problem during racing too.

This sounds like a good idea if you go atleast 30-60 seconds behind leader i think you should have no collisions. I cant tell you how many times i have hit lappers when racing someone for lead.

[yzmxer608]

That would be realistic.

well it wouldnt be.

I was being sarcastic haha, I knew I should have put the smiley in.

[rideblue56]

lol. i know you were, i was agreeing

[Redbull]

We need 250 2 strokes, 450's, and lastly 500 2 strokes.

[yzmxer608]

WHY??!!?? I'm tired of hearing "I want 450's, I want big bikes". It's annoying, jlv will put them in when he puts them in. Stop being so impatient.

[rideblue56]

im not even sure that 250's and 450f's would be that fun.. i mean cuz you have to slow down so much for obstacles half the race would be slowing down. imagine hitting loraccos leap wide open on a 450, youd land in the corner. lol, what i mean is that you'd have to have ALOT of throttle control all the time. and there would never be any struggles to get that extra bit of speed for the huge uphill triple.

[MxWolf]

he said "they will be here in the not so near future" somewhere

i dont get why people even want those its not gonna be any different whoohooo a 450 on a track that you can overjump everything on a 250


first we need better movement on the bike at least visually
ability to have traction like if you have a prepped track

it would be cool if when you started the track was prepped and then as you go the track looses moisture and gets packed and get less traction

[Redbull]

im not even sure that 250's and 450f's would be that fun.. i mean cuz you have to slow down so much for obstacles half the race would be slowing down. imagine hitting loraccos leap wide open on a 450, youd land in the corner. lol, what i mean is that you'd have to have ALOT of throttle control all the time. and there would never be any struggles to get that extra bit of speed for the huge uphill triple.

Well instead of railing the berms you take the inside line almost everytime. The erode would help the bigger bikes if it worked better. Also the tracks are perfectly smooth and in real life they are not so the bikes get perfect traction and more speed.

Also i dont feel like the game has enough gravity you seem to go to far and high.

[yzmxer608]

Think I asked this already, but do the "bigger" games (CoD series ect.) just flat out have better game engines? I'm just wondering why mxs isn't graphically as good as those games but this still lags. Today while testing my track with 80 for all graphical sliders (model detail was at 60, 128x128 for texture res) I was getting lag from the roost in 3rd person. It wasn't constant, barely happened but usually when I started from a standstill. If particles like that make the game lag, I don't see the game ever looking graphically awesome like the newer games.

So, are those game's engines just that much better or is there something else? I know it's a free engine, but I don't want the game to never look better than what it does now as far as particles and other effects go.

[RaNDoM HeRO]

i was also wondering why do the particles make my computer lag so much

[rideblue56]

maybe cuz its so many little particles?

[Mikey]

Because they eat start eating your PC

[RaNDoM HeRO]

*gulps*