2013 MX Sim Cup (Monster energy cup)

[barrington314]

No, its to big for a normal Sx track. ( especially the triple )

Lots of yays and nehs about this triple. So I want you guys to understand it.
The track was built at 1.25:1, as close as I could judge without having any real blueprints, like JLV does for SX. The only jump I had any intel on was the big triple, which they had said was increased in length from a typical sx to 100 feet. So that means in game I would be making it 125 feet peak to peak. And from there I looked at where the jumps in the lane next to it fell into place. I saw that they had 4 singles in about the length of the big triple. If you pay attention to where everything is at, I think I got the scale pretty close. The next part is to figure out how peaked or not peaked to make the jumps. Well I can do all of the triples on the track on a 125. So I couldnt make them much easier to do or 450s would be way over riding the track. In real life some pro's were not doing the small triple before that big one. I think the only thing I may have messed up on was not making it easier to tire tap over that first triple to keep your momentum for the next one. But if you get your corner speed up, its gravy.
But anyways, I put more thought into this than some of you may have think I did.

[AWood]

Stephen just shit on all of you.

[KarlssonRacing]

[img]https://imageshack.com/scaled/large/841/hd6b.png[mg] A problem for me.. the decals doesn´t show up.

I honestly never thought there would be people that would have this track and not have 2013 supercross.
You need 2013 supercross.

ahahhh okey thanks for a quick answer, well im not so much into supercross, only the MEC tracks

[juniormx11]

not to sound like a complete idiot, but for a track that has been put so much time and effort towards.. it is unbelievably in-accurate.

[juniormx11]

forget i said that, wrong topic -.-

[Yamahaman95]

Stephen just shit on all of you.

really? don't think so kid, nice try though, i'm pretty sure this was just a normal discussion not a fight, soooo..yeah...no

[MX PRODIGY 17]

forget i said that, wrong topic -.-

For once I am happy I continued reading down instead of immediately clicking the "Quote" button and rage posting.

[137]

I honestly didn't really like the track. The first rythem was cool but the double after? A bit to much don't you think, the rollers they were ehh, the finish line was small as all hell unless thats how it was in the real race, the 3-3-3 section is fun, the triple out of the corner could have been a little bit easier and the triple face should have been just an inch or 2 higher and it would have been perfect. The back double before going in front of the start gates was like 30ft and in real life it looked to be within 10-15ft. And then I didn't really like the fact you could wide open around the s turns on a 250f. and the thing in the middle could have been a bit longer to avoid carnage in the race. But overall it's still a decent track.

[AuTo MaTik]

I can't believe anyone is actually complaining about this track to be completely honest... It was such a fun track to actually race on. From what Barrington showed us about the triple, that's damn near perfect scale. The triple was super sick and was pretty easy to do, even on a 250. The double after the JS7 section was fun as hell to get gnarly on, so who cares if it's not exactly right? The rollers were prime. The finish line was fun to scrub. As Barrington said, some of the guys in real life weren't even tripling before the monster triple, so I feel like if most of the AM's weren't tripling it, he did it right.

Hat's of Barrington, you did a solid job in this track for sure!

[MX PRODIGY 17]

I can't believe anyone is actually complaining about this track to be completely honest... It was such a fun track to actually race on. From what Barrington showed us about the triple, that's damn near perfect scale. The triple was super sick and was pretty easy to do, even on a 250. The double after the JS7 section was fun as hell to get gnarly on, so who cares if it's not exactly right? The rollers were prime. The finish line was fun to scrub. As Barrington said, some of the guys in real life weren't even tripling before the monster triple, so I feel like if most of the AM's weren't tripling it, he did it right.

Hat's of Barrington, you did a solid job in this track for sure!

x2. Don't know how you could have imporved on this one.

[barrington314]

People can not like it. Thats fine. Theres tracks that i dont like that others love. The comments that bug me are "looks like it was just thrown together". I think if you analyze the pics I posted, you'll see that I didn't just "throw it together".
Anyways, seems that most of you liked it. I didn't plan on doing much more before Glen Helen, but now I wanna make something else before SX. Genova and a new 2011 MEC are on my mind.

[137]

That was just my honest opinion. I'll always ride this track because its such a fun layout, it's just everyone has a different style on making tracks and there is nothing wrong with that. Looking forward to your upcoming tracks Barrington. Lemme know if you need any help or beta testers

[Ddavis]

Kyle I know you made a quite good version yourself, but you don't need to criticize Stephen's work, especially when you know how much work goes into this. I personally loved the track, very technical and very fun. Just very difficult to race on, but look at RV's crash, tiny mistakes cost you big on this track. I give it an 9/10

[137]

Kyle I know you made a quite good version yourself, but you don't need to criticize Stephen's work, especially when you know how much work goes into this. I personally loved the track, very technical and very fun. Just very difficult to race on, but look at RV's crash, tiny mistakes cost you big on this track. I give it an 9/10

I'm not criticizing, i'm just putting my point of view, and I know how much work goes into a track.

[barrington314]

Not many people have the same style in track creation. Which is good because not everyone likes the same stuff.