2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Organize races and post results here
KaseoDip
Village Idiot
Posts: 1879
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:39 pm
Team: Tegridy Farms
Location: Kansas

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by KaseoDip »

I honestly don't understand how Devin isn't muted on this forum yet. All he does it post over and over and over again and 95% of his posts are him getting in fights with other people
CeeJayHDz
Posts: 696
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2015 5:05 pm
Team: Privateer

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by CeeJayHDz »

cmon peter i cant wait to see these protests after all the drama in 250s last week
Image
Ohagan75
Posts: 3777
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 3:17 am
Team: Prime Design GFX
Location: Australia
Contact:

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by Ohagan75 »

KaseoDip wrote:I honestly don't understand how Devin isn't muted on this forum yet. All he does it post over and over and over again and 95% of his posts are him getting in fights with other people
Let's not forget all the times he has told people to kill themselves. It's beyond me how he can post anywhere.
Image
Donate if you like My Creations
checkerz
Posts: 8791
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 4:23 am
Team: RaGe Factory

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by checkerz »

T_Frye127 wrote:tp, but the dudes that have bought a membership in novice should easily be moved to ams if requested. there isnt even 40 guys in ams. also if they bought a memebership, they shouldnt be forced to race with dudes that didnt buy one. and you got guys that actually are novice class just starting the game and racing these dudes that should easily be in ams lol.
Uh yea...we already automatically approve a B license when requested from a full membership holder. It's their choice to stay down, we aren't forcing it.

Anyone with a single RF pro or Am point was bumped out of Novice before the year. They might get one series in sandbagging but then will have to go.

It was a new rule, so it'll take a series for it to work as intended.
T_Frye127
Posts: 923
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 2:15 am
Team: Volcom
Location: NW Indiana
Contact:

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by T_Frye127 »

checkerz wrote: Uh yea...we already automatically approve a B license when requested from a full membership holder. It's their choice to stay down, we aren't forcing it.

Anyone with a single RF pro or Am point was bumped out of Novice before the year. They might get one series in sandbagging but then will have to go.

It was a new rule, so it'll take a series for it to work as intended.
those little shit heads lied to me then hahah :p

At first i just thought most of these dudes were just not wanting to pay so they raced novice, then talked to a few of them and they said that had purchased a membership and requested the license needed to race ams but you guys didnt bump them up.

just stood out to me cos my buddy just started playing and wants to race and you got guys in novice winning by 30 seconds with 60 people signed up, yet there are not even 30 people signed up for 250 ams.
motokid499
Posts: 1623
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:25 am
Team: Phil's
Location: Vancouver Island
Contact:

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by motokid499 »

CeeJayHDz wrote:cmon peter i cant wait to see these protests after all the drama in 250s last week
what you talkin aboot?????
Tanner Rogers
ROSE822
Posts: 1430
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:41 pm
Team: Hidden Design
Location: United Kingdom

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by ROSE822 »

motokid499 wrote:
CeeJayHDz wrote:cmon peter i cant wait to see these protests after all the drama in 250s last week
what you talkin aboot?????
oooo Tanner roges oooo you know exactly what hes talking about ;)
Image
motokid499
Posts: 1623
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:25 am
Team: Phil's
Location: Vancouver Island
Contact:

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by motokid499 »

ROSE822 wrote:
motokid499 wrote:
CeeJayHDz wrote:cmon peter i cant wait to see these protests after all the drama in 250s last week
what you talkin aboot?????
oooo Tanner roges oooo you know exactly what hes talking about ;)
No ragrets
Tanner Rogers
Hi Im Skyqe
Posts: 3020
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:52 pm
Team: wat

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by Hi Im Skyqe »

motokid499 wrote:
ROSE822 wrote:
motokid499 wrote:
what you talkin aboot?????
oooo Tanner roges oooo you know exactly what hes talking about ;)
No ragrets
Image
ROSE822
Posts: 1430
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:41 pm
Team: Hidden Design
Location: United Kingdom

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by ROSE822 »

I'm sorry but you gave Thomas Silleck a One Week Ban for hardly nothing but Kellen gets no penalty for a obvious take out? Guess he's been arse licking someone recently...
Image
Tbonemx428
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 12:10 am

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by Tbonemx428 »

ROSE822 wrote:I'm sorry but you gave Thomas Silleck a One Week Ban for hardly nothing but Kellen gets no penalty for a obvious take out? Guess he's been arse licking someone recently...
Not complaining but I don't understand why I was given a one week suspension. I was stuck ontop of Tanner and there was no way I could have gotten off of him without jumping off. Walter could have easily checked up and went inside of me. "Unsafe track re-entry" when I was on the track the whole time. Neither one of us got fall offs so I dont understand why I was given a suspension.
mxsrider96
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:15 am
Team: PoGo
Location: Indiana

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by mxsrider96 »

You rode backwards. End of story
WAR CRY <3
Sun Burn
Cody Darr
Posts: 1646
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:16 pm
Team: Start Your Systems
Location: Central PA

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by Cody Darr »

ROSE822 wrote:I'm sorry but you gave Thomas Silleck a One Week Ban for hardly nothing but Kellen gets no penalty for a obvious take out? Guess he's been arse licking someone recently...
Nah good try though! I don't know if you noticed but this is similar to the Rush/Shack incident and Rush didn't receive a penalty, so I see no harm no foul here. Plus from the gif on the site the takeout was not intentional, if you think otherwise still please send me what your smoking!
2011 LRS Monday Night local Series 125 Pro Champion
jlv wrote:What a dope! He should have saved that move for the last lap like Cody Darr!
MOTOZ293
Posts: 3073
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 7:17 pm
Team: Hog Heaven Racing
Location: Ohio

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by MOTOZ293 »

ROSE822 wrote:I'm sorry but you gave Thomas Silleck a One Week Ban for hardly nothing but Kellen gets no penalty for a obvious take out? Guess he's been arse licking someone recently...
He didn't get a penalty because he tried to square up the corner but traction caught too early and put your lines together. I agree that there shouldn't be a penalty on either of your protests. Both were racing incidents
Image
ROSE822
Posts: 1430
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 6:41 pm
Team: Hidden Design
Location: United Kingdom

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)

Post by ROSE822 »

Watch out boys aggressive riding tonight :)
Image
Post Reply