2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)
-
- Village Idiot
- Posts: 1879
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:39 pm
- Team: Tegridy Farms
- Location: Kansas
Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)
I honestly don't understand how Devin isn't muted on this forum yet. All he does it post over and over and over again and 95% of his posts are him getting in fights with other people
Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)
cmon peter i cant wait to see these protests after all the drama in 250s last week

-
- Posts: 3777
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 3:17 am
- Team: Prime Design GFX
- Location: Australia
- Contact:
Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)
Let's not forget all the times he has told people to kill themselves. It's beyond me how he can post anywhere.KaseoDip wrote:I honestly don't understand how Devin isn't muted on this forum yet. All he does it post over and over and over again and 95% of his posts are him getting in fights with other people
Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)
Uh yea...we already automatically approve a B license when requested from a full membership holder. It's their choice to stay down, we aren't forcing it.T_Frye127 wrote:tp, but the dudes that have bought a membership in novice should easily be moved to ams if requested. there isnt even 40 guys in ams. also if they bought a memebership, they shouldnt be forced to race with dudes that didnt buy one. and you got guys that actually are novice class just starting the game and racing these dudes that should easily be in ams lol.
Anyone with a single RF pro or Am point was bumped out of Novice before the year. They might get one series in sandbagging but then will have to go.
It was a new rule, so it'll take a series for it to work as intended.
Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)
those little shit heads lied to me then hahah :pcheckerz wrote: Uh yea...we already automatically approve a B license when requested from a full membership holder. It's their choice to stay down, we aren't forcing it.
Anyone with a single RF pro or Am point was bumped out of Novice before the year. They might get one series in sandbagging but then will have to go.
It was a new rule, so it'll take a series for it to work as intended.
At first i just thought most of these dudes were just not wanting to pay so they raced novice, then talked to a few of them and they said that had purchased a membership and requested the license needed to race ams but you guys didnt bump them up.
just stood out to me cos my buddy just started playing and wants to race and you got guys in novice winning by 30 seconds with 60 people signed up, yet there are not even 30 people signed up for 250 ams.
-
- Posts: 1623
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:25 am
- Team: Phil's
- Location: Vancouver Island
- Contact:
Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)
what you talkin aboot?????CeeJayHDz wrote:cmon peter i cant wait to see these protests after all the drama in 250s last week
Tanner Rogers
Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)
oooo Tanner roges oooo you know exactly what hes talking aboutmotokid499 wrote:what you talkin aboot?????CeeJayHDz wrote:cmon peter i cant wait to see these protests after all the drama in 250s last week


-
- Posts: 1623
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 2:25 am
- Team: Phil's
- Location: Vancouver Island
- Contact:
Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)
No ragretsROSE822 wrote:oooo Tanner roges oooo you know exactly what hes talking aboutmotokid499 wrote:what you talkin aboot?????CeeJayHDz wrote:cmon peter i cant wait to see these protests after all the drama in 250s last week
Tanner Rogers
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:52 pm
- Team: wat
Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)
motokid499 wrote:No ragretsROSE822 wrote:oooo Tanner roges oooo you know exactly what hes talking aboutmotokid499 wrote:
what you talkin aboot?????

Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)
I'm sorry but you gave Thomas Silleck a One Week Ban for hardly nothing but Kellen gets no penalty for a obvious take out? Guess he's been arse licking someone recently...

-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 12:10 am
Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)
Not complaining but I don't understand why I was given a one week suspension. I was stuck ontop of Tanner and there was no way I could have gotten off of him without jumping off. Walter could have easily checked up and went inside of me. "Unsafe track re-entry" when I was on the track the whole time. Neither one of us got fall offs so I dont understand why I was given a suspension.ROSE822 wrote:I'm sorry but you gave Thomas Silleck a One Week Ban for hardly nothing but Kellen gets no penalty for a obvious take out? Guess he's been arse licking someone recently...
-
- Posts: 3603
- Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:15 am
- Team: PoGo
- Location: Indiana
-
- Posts: 1646
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:16 pm
- Team: Start Your Systems
- Location: Central PA
Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)
Nah good try though! I don't know if you noticed but this is similar to the Rush/Shack incident and Rush didn't receive a penalty, so I see no harm no foul here. Plus from the gif on the site the takeout was not intentional, if you think otherwise still please send me what your smoking!ROSE822 wrote:I'm sorry but you gave Thomas Silleck a One Week Ban for hardly nothing but Kellen gets no penalty for a obvious take out? Guess he's been arse licking someone recently...
2011 LRS Monday Night local Series 125 Pro Champion
jlv wrote:What a dope! He should have saved that move for the last lap like Cody Darr!
Re: 2017 rF Supercross (Pro and Amateur)
He didn't get a penalty because he tried to square up the corner but traction caught too early and put your lines together. I agree that there shouldn't be a penalty on either of your protests. Both were racing incidentsROSE822 wrote:I'm sorry but you gave Thomas Silleck a One Week Ban for hardly nothing but Kellen gets no penalty for a obvious take out? Guess he's been arse licking someone recently...
