S3 WMSA Nationals Track Poll
Re: S3 WMSA Nationals Track Poll
looks like another year with all my favorite tracks....
-
- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 2:13 am
- Team: Privateer
- Location: Cascavel - Brazil
Re: S3 WMSA Nationals Track Poll
damn smiith down is a flat track , put another
Ridge Riders whatever .... pls
on flat tracks everybody can run in same lap time
Ridge Riders whatever .... pls
on flat tracks everybody can run in same lap time
Mbutler183 wrote:I remember when we had to play mva instead of mxs, what a load of shit that was.
Re: S3 WMSA Nationals Track Poll
everyone but me...
-
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2007 12:41 am
- Team: Privateer
- Location: West Kentucky, USA
Re: S3 WMSA Nationals Track Poll
The community votes, and i HATE ride Riders.
D.Eckels #421 "The O-G"
-
- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 2:13 am
- Team: Privateer
- Location: Cascavel - Brazil
Re: S3 WMSA Nationals Track Poll
ha , fine i'm just saying that everyone can be fast on this tracks
Mbutler183 wrote:I remember when we had to play mva instead of mxs, what a load of shit that was.
Re: S3 WMSA Nationals Track Poll
so then we should get good racing going on instead of everyone spreading out
"90 percent of the game is half mental"-Yogi Berra
Thanks To Kawasakis For The Sig
Thanks To Kawasakis For The Sig
-
- Posts: 1526
- Joined: Sun Dec 14, 2008 4:46 pm
Re: S3 WMSA Nationals Track Poll
why arent people voting for thunder valley that much? i love that track. im gonna go ride it tomorrow in real life!!!!
Re: S3 WMSA Nationals Track Poll
Donington park is fun
Re: S3 WMSA Nationals Track Poll
Looking good to me so far. Except for RedBud. Riding fast on that track is like counting to a Googol. In other words; it ain't happening anytime soon!
[For those of you who don't know, a googol is 10^100, which is significantly more than the number of atoms in the universe. I'll let Carl Sagan explain! He makes everything interesting.]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lFQOmb6 ... annel_page
[For those of you who don't know, a googol is 10^100, which is significantly more than the number of atoms in the universe. I'll let Carl Sagan explain! He makes everything interesting.]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lFQOmb6 ... annel_page
Give me more power.
Give me more handling.
Give me more style.
Give me more Maico.
Re: S3 WMSA Nationals Track Poll
i counted to a googol once then i wrote it on a paper then i made one with a 1000 zeros it only took like 15 min to do both
"90 percent of the game is half mental"-Yogi Berra
Thanks To Kawasakis For The Sig
Thanks To Kawasakis For The Sig
Re: S3 WMSA Nationals Track Poll
It's easy to write a Googol, but counting to it is clearly impossible. Counting to a million would take in excess of a week if you went at the rate of one per second, that's just 10^6, rather than 10^100. To put this into perspective, the number of atoms, in a pie is 10^26, and the number of atoms in the known universe is less than 10^90, a LOT less. I can only conclude that you were either joking, or mistaken. Good luck writing a googolplex though, that's 10^googol, as Carl noted.
Give me more power.
Give me more handling.
Give me more style.
Give me more Maico.
Re: S3 WMSA Nationals Track Poll
Umm......WHAT?
Re: S3 WMSA Nationals Track Poll
yeh what?..........
My photography work
www.mikeowenphotographer.com
www.mikeowenphotographer.com
Re: S3 WMSA Nationals Track Poll
I'm just saying that it's absolutely impossible for a human to count to a googol. There hasn't been a googol seconds since the Big Bang, it's simply impossible, even though it's trivial to write out in digits.
Give me more power.
Give me more handling.
Give me more style.
Give me more Maico.
Re: S3 WMSA Nationals Track Poll
Was this really necessary?JETZcorp wrote:It's easy to write a Googol, but counting to it is clearly impossible. Counting to a million would take in excess of a week if you went at the rate of one per second, that's just 10^6, rather than 10^100. To put this into perspective, the number of atoms, in a pie is 10^26, and the number of atoms in the known universe is less than 10^90, a LOT less. I can only conclude that you were either joking, or mistaken. Good luck writing a googolplex though, that's 10^googol, as Carl noted.
You could have just said what you just said to us?
Oh well, thanks for the quick maths/history lesson haha.