thanks looks like ill need to push it a bit more on the corners witch by the way are some of the best I've ever rodeAuTo MaTik wrote:Times are going to be really close. Hunter Root has a 56 already, but I think you're going to need under a minute to be in safely in the 250 class. 450s you'll probably need a 58.podium1 wrote:I put down a 1 02 on the rm125 and was wondering what the qualifying average time will be for all classes
2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing
Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing
"Games fuckin Broken" -Dmull
-
- Posts: 1962
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:59 pm
- Team: 2 good 4 a team
Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing
i got a 57.3 on a rm125 hahahapodium1 wrote:I put down a 1 02 on the rm125 and was wondering what the qualifying average time will be for all classes
jlv wrote:Because he didn't come in here and confess like an idiot.Rush wrote:Why was UID 12235 not banned as well? he was doing the same thing.
Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing
ha ha nice bro! you must have been flying!GustavoMX930' wrote:i got a 57.3 on a rm125 hahahapodium1 wrote:I put down a 1 02 on the rm125 and was wondering what the qualifying average time will be for all classes
"Games fuckin Broken" -Dmull
-
- Posts: 3131
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 1:51 am
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing
I honestly don't like the track, and its just my opinion. I don't at all enjoy the WFO nature, pinning it in 3rd gear to step on step off, for example.
Also, I don't understand the need for 11.5-12ft high triple kickers. It makes for an unrealistic flight through the air. I much prefer the 8.5ft MAX height rule JLV used through 2012. Oakland 2012 had a maximum heigh of 7.5 feet for any jump on the track. The tops of the tables for this 2014 track are 7.5ft.
Anyway, thanks for making the track for the community to enjoy.
Also, I don't understand the need for 11.5-12ft high triple kickers. It makes for an unrealistic flight through the air. I much prefer the 8.5ft MAX height rule JLV used through 2012. Oakland 2012 had a maximum heigh of 7.5 feet for any jump on the track. The tops of the tables for this 2014 track are 7.5ft.
Anyway, thanks for making the track for the community to enjoy.
ShackAttack12
| 2010 Supercross Champ | 2011 Supercross Champ | 2019 Supercross Champ |
Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing
I'm not a huge fan, either. Feels like Portland from MVAU. Still a solid track, though.
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 255 character limit.
-
- Posts: 6614
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 6:03 pm
- Team: me
- Location: Charleston, SC
Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing
Your height readings are a little high. The base is like 2.16 ft or something high.ShackAttack12 wrote:I honestly don't like the track, and its just my opinion. I don't at all enjoy the WFO nature, pinning it in 3rd gear to step on step off, for example.
Also, I don't understand the need for 11.5-12ft high triple kickers. It makes for an unrealistic flight through the air. I much prefer the 8.5ft MAX height rule JLV used through 2012. Oakland 2012 had a maximum heigh of 7.5 feet for any jump on the track. The tops of the tables for this 2014 track are 7.5ft.
Anyway, thanks for making the track for the community to enjoy.
Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing
Is everyone hitting the inside after the finish and the inside over the slightly off camber turning single?
Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing
I'm not sure who's been making the 2014 tracks, but I'm just not a fan. They remind me of supercross tracks from MVA Reflex, where everything is oversized and WFO. The whole point of this game is to be a simulation, and this year's tracks are nothing of the sort. No offense to whoever's creating them, it's great that you're putting in the time for everyone, but these tracks kind of defeat the purpose of the game and why so many people play it.
Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing
Im also not the greatest fan of the track but that's me.
there's just something off about the triple faces, Also the whoops but i guess there made like that so you don't get yelled out from everyone like last week.
How ever thanks for the work you guys put in every week for us to have a series and tracks.
there's just something off about the triple faces, Also the whoops but i guess there made like that so you don't get yelled out from everyone like last week.
How ever thanks for the work you guys put in every week for us to have a series and tracks.
-
- Crushed Dissenter
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:53 pm
- Team: Privateer
Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing
Barrington is Prolly just as bad as awood. I bet ur some needy lookin dude, u always have something to say to anyone who complains. Not everyone is goin to praise the track so quit bein a tit an let me complain and u just sit over there with ur butt buddies and keep ur mouth shut buddy
Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing
If they made it as real as possible with 1:1 scale there would be even more people bitching about it. Have you not seen how gnarly sx is irl? It is crazy big. I feel these tracks are as close as they can get and still be fun, there are realer than jlvs (no offense to all the fan boys or jlv himself) tracks in my opinion.Nikhil wrote:I'm not sure who's been making the 2014 tracks, but I'm just not a fan. They remind me of supercross tracks from MVA Reflex, where everything is oversized and WFO. The whole point of this game is to be a simulation, and this year's tracks are nothing of the sort. No offense to whoever's creating them, it's great that you're putting in the time for everyone, but these tracks kind of defeat the purpose of the game and why so many people play it.
Just like outdoors. Everyone screams realism until Hagg gave everyone realism and then everyone freaked out and hated it because it was too difficult. In result we got more water down tracks, just like they are having to do for the whoops. It's all apart of finding that fine line between realism and fun.
Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing
You can leave nowhondaracer48 wrote:Barrington is Prolly just as bad as awood. I bet ur some needy lookin dude, u always have something to say to anyone who complains. Not everyone is goin to praise the track so quit bein a tit an let me complain and u just sit over there with ur butt buddies and keep ur mouth shut buddy
Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing
Or you could stop being a whiny bitch and give feedback worth listening to. The only one being a tit here is you, people like you are the ones that will drive the community, its racing, and it's content into the ground.hondaracer48 wrote:Barrington is Prolly just as bad as awood. I bet ur some needy lookin dude, u always have something to say to anyone who complains. Not everyone is goin to praise the track so quit bein a tit an let me complain and u just sit over there with ur butt buddies and keep ur mouth shut buddy
-
- Posts: 709
- Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:29 pm
- Team: MotoRAD
- Location: Los Angeles, California
- Contact:
Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing
i love this track, best track to me this year haha 

Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing
Can we bring back JLV styled tracks? Lol