2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Organize races and post results here
podium1
Posts: 422
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:00 pm

Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by podium1 »

AuTo MaTik wrote:
podium1 wrote:I put down a 1 02 on the rm125 and was wondering what the qualifying average time will be for all classes
Times are going to be really close. Hunter Root has a 56 already, but I think you're going to need under a minute to be in safely in the 250 class. 450s you'll probably need a 58.
thanks looks like ill need to push it a bit more on the corners witch by the way are some of the best I've ever rode
"Games fuckin Broken" -Dmull
GustavoMX930'
Posts: 1962
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:59 pm
Team: 2 good 4 a team

Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by GustavoMX930' »

podium1 wrote:I put down a 1 02 on the rm125 and was wondering what the qualifying average time will be for all classes
i got a 57.3 on a rm125 hahaha
jlv wrote:
Rush wrote:Why was UID 12235 not banned as well? he was doing the same thing.
Because he didn't come in here and confess like an idiot.
podium1
Posts: 422
Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:00 pm

Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by podium1 »

GustavoMX930' wrote:
podium1 wrote:I put down a 1 02 on the rm125 and was wondering what the qualifying average time will be for all classes
i got a 57.3 on a rm125 hahaha
ha ha nice bro! you must have been flying!
"Games fuckin Broken" -Dmull
ShackAttack12
Posts: 3131
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 1:51 am
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by ShackAttack12 »

I honestly don't like the track, and its just my opinion. I don't at all enjoy the WFO nature, pinning it in 3rd gear to step on step off, for example.

Also, I don't understand the need for 11.5-12ft high triple kickers. It makes for an unrealistic flight through the air. I much prefer the 8.5ft MAX height rule JLV used through 2012. Oakland 2012 had a maximum heigh of 7.5 feet for any jump on the track. The tops of the tables for this 2014 track are 7.5ft.

Anyway, thanks for making the track for the community to enjoy.
ShackAttack12
| 2010 Supercross Champ | 2011 Supercross Champ | 2019 Supercross Champ |
KTM57
Posts: 13862
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:42 am
Location: TX
Contact:

Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by KTM57 »

I'm not a huge fan, either. Feels like Portland from MVAU. Still a solid track, though.
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 255 character limit.
barrington314
Posts: 6614
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 6:03 pm
Team: me
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by barrington314 »

ShackAttack12 wrote:I honestly don't like the track, and its just my opinion. I don't at all enjoy the WFO nature, pinning it in 3rd gear to step on step off, for example.

Also, I don't understand the need for 11.5-12ft high triple kickers. It makes for an unrealistic flight through the air. I much prefer the 8.5ft MAX height rule JLV used through 2012. Oakland 2012 had a maximum heigh of 7.5 feet for any jump on the track. The tops of the tables for this 2014 track are 7.5ft.

Anyway, thanks for making the track for the community to enjoy.
Your height readings are a little high. The base is like 2.16 ft or something high.
Nick481
Posts: 93
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:44 pm
Location: Central FL

Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by Nick481 »

Is everyone hitting the inside after the finish and the inside over the slightly off camber turning single?
Nikhil
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 3:14 am

Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by Nikhil »

I'm not sure who's been making the 2014 tracks, but I'm just not a fan. They remind me of supercross tracks from MVA Reflex, where everything is oversized and WFO. The whole point of this game is to be a simulation, and this year's tracks are nothing of the sort. No offense to whoever's creating them, it's great that you're putting in the time for everyone, but these tracks kind of defeat the purpose of the game and why so many people play it.
Craig
Posts: 1060
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:37 am

Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by Craig »

Im also not the greatest fan of the track but that's me.
there's just something off about the triple faces, Also the whoops but i guess there made like that so you don't get yelled out from everyone like last week.
How ever thanks for the work you guys put in every week for us to have a series and tracks.
hondaracer48
Crushed Dissenter
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 2:53 pm
Team: Privateer

Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by hondaracer48 »

Barrington is Prolly just as bad as awood. I bet ur some needy lookin dude, u always have something to say to anyone who complains. Not everyone is goin to praise the track so quit bein a tit an let me complain and u just sit over there with ur butt buddies and keep ur mouth shut buddy
m121c
Posts: 3056
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 5:36 am
Location: Iowa

Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by m121c »

Nikhil wrote:I'm not sure who's been making the 2014 tracks, but I'm just not a fan. They remind me of supercross tracks from MVA Reflex, where everything is oversized and WFO. The whole point of this game is to be a simulation, and this year's tracks are nothing of the sort. No offense to whoever's creating them, it's great that you're putting in the time for everyone, but these tracks kind of defeat the purpose of the game and why so many people play it.
If they made it as real as possible with 1:1 scale there would be even more people bitching about it. Have you not seen how gnarly sx is irl? It is crazy big. I feel these tracks are as close as they can get and still be fun, there are realer than jlvs (no offense to all the fan boys or jlv himself) tracks in my opinion.

Just like outdoors. Everyone screams realism until Hagg gave everyone realism and then everyone freaked out and hated it because it was too difficult. In result we got more water down tracks, just like they are having to do for the whoops. It's all apart of finding that fine line between realism and fun.
Craig
Posts: 1060
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:37 am

Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by Craig »

hondaracer48 wrote:Barrington is Prolly just as bad as awood. I bet ur some needy lookin dude, u always have something to say to anyone who complains. Not everyone is goin to praise the track so quit bein a tit an let me complain and u just sit over there with ur butt buddies and keep ur mouth shut buddy
You can leave now
m121c
Posts: 3056
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 5:36 am
Location: Iowa

Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by m121c »

hondaracer48 wrote:Barrington is Prolly just as bad as awood. I bet ur some needy lookin dude, u always have something to say to anyone who complains. Not everyone is goin to praise the track so quit bein a tit an let me complain and u just sit over there with ur butt buddies and keep ur mouth shut buddy
Or you could stop being a whiny bitch and give feedback worth listening to. The only one being a tit here is you, people like you are the ones that will drive the community, its racing, and it's content into the ground.
jason_pama
Posts: 709
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:29 pm
Team: MotoRAD
Location: Los Angeles, California
Contact:

Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by jason_pama »

i love this track, best track to me this year haha :lol:
Ddavis
Posts: 17983
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2011 1:02 am

Re: 2014 rF MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by Ddavis »

Can we bring back JLV styled tracks? Lol
Post Reply