MXS Twitter

I've heard conversation coming out of animal pens that is more intelligent than what is going on in here.
760Liam
Posts: 1404
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2011 5:33 pm
Location: California

Re: MXS Twitter

Post by 760Liam »

TBH, I hate the gt500's. For the price, it's not worth it. They're alright on the outside, but on the inside its bad. The interior is cheap plastic and cloth. If I were spending that much on a car, you'd think that you wouldn't have to spend extra for a decent interior.
Image
squirrelboy86
Posts: 583
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:16 pm
Team: SD | Action Suzuki

Re: MXS Twitter

Post by squirrelboy86 »

760Liam wrote:TBH, I hate the gt500's. For the price, it's not worth it. They're alright on the outside, but on the inside its bad. The interior is cheap plastic and cloth. If I were spending that much on a car, you'd think that you wouldn't have to spend extra for a decent interior.
Can't expect much from ford, there is a reason they are so cheap for the power! Although I do like the 2013 gt500, I would not choose that if I had the money for one. Also I am not a fan of the challenger or charger, the price to performance ratio is not that great in my opinion. I would go for a corvette before a srt8 392 challenger, and I actually drove a 392. A badass car but for that much I would rather spend a bit more for a used Cadillac CTS-V (supercharged 556hp :D), unless I did not need to seat 5.Then I would go for a supercharged c6 vette :D. Also most of the cars we are talking about are probably more expensive than that Caymen because that looks like it is a used one which could go for maybe 35-45k.
Roy Mitchell wrote:I got cockblocked by the refrigerator
Click for go fast.
Hi Im Skyqe
Posts: 3020
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:52 pm
Team: wat

Re: MXS Twitter

Post by Hi Im Skyqe »

squirrelboy86 wrote:
760Liam wrote:TBH, I hate the gt500's. For the price, it's not worth it. They're alright on the outside, but on the inside its bad. The interior is cheap plastic and cloth. If I were spending that much on a car, you'd think that you wouldn't have to spend extra for a decent interior.
Can't expect much from ford, there is a reason they are so cheap for the power! Although I do like the 2013 gt500, I would not choose that if I had the money for one. Also I am not a fan of the challenger or charger, the price to performance ratio is not that great in my opinion. I would go for a corvette before a srt8 392 challenger, and I actually drove a 392. A badass car but for that much I would rather spend a bit more for a used Cadillac CTS-V (supercharged 556hp :D), unless I did not need to seat 5.Then I would go for a supercharged c6 vette :D. Also most of the cars we are talking about are probably more expensive than that Caymen because that looks like it is a used one which could go for maybe 35-45k.
Reread my post. I am not talking about the 392 I am talking about the 6.2 that is coming out for 2015.

As for the GT500 comment, the 2012 and prior models were great to make cheap power with however the 2013 with the new motor and higher boost is not as cheap to modify.
squirrelboy86
Posts: 583
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:16 pm
Team: SD | Action Suzuki

Re: MXS Twitter

Post by squirrelboy86 »

I did read it I was just talking about the ones that are out right now. Also, I have not seen anywhere them confirming a hp number or the transmission, the current 8 speed transmission they have is only capable of holding 516 ft-lbs. Do you have a link to your source for all this?
Roy Mitchell wrote:I got cockblocked by the refrigerator
Click for go fast.
Phathry25
Posts: 7481
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:09 am
Team: No Frills Racing
Location: WI
Contact:

Re: MXS Twitter

Post by Phathry25 »

Isn't there a car talk thread?
JT43
Crushed Dissenter
Posts: 3245
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 8:33 pm
Team: MotardMatt220
Location: KTM57

Re: MXS Twitter

Post by JT43 »

Phathry25 wrote:Isn't there a car talk thread?
Have you got anything better to be discussing here?
jlv wrote: Motardmatt220 is a crock of shit
KTM57 wrote: August is 13 years old and thinks he's hot shit because he's a lot younger than everyone else
Phathry25
Posts: 7481
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:09 am
Team: No Frills Racing
Location: WI
Contact:

Re: MXS Twitter

Post by Phathry25 »

I always assumed this was a thread for random small bits of chatter. Not two page diatribes about why Fords suck. I'm fine with shack posting " I'm thinking about buying a douchemobile".

Long drawn out posts discussing the finer points of car and car parts design should reside I the car talk topic. Which is why I hunted there's a topic for it.
JT43
Crushed Dissenter
Posts: 3245
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 8:33 pm
Team: MotardMatt220
Location: KTM57

Re: MXS Twitter

Post by JT43 »

Can't argue with that! Phats right again...
jlv wrote: Motardmatt220 is a crock of shit
KTM57 wrote: August is 13 years old and thinks he's hot shit because he's a lot younger than everyone else
squirrelboy86
Posts: 583
Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:16 pm
Team: SD | Action Suzuki

Re: MXS Twitter

Post by squirrelboy86 »

Phathry25 wrote:douchemobile
Explain how a performance car is a "douchemobile".Is it the fact that it is more expensive then some piece of shit and that if anybody can afford more than you can because they are more successful makes them a douche?
Roy Mitchell wrote:I got cockblocked by the refrigerator
Click for go fast.
ShackAttack12
Posts: 3131
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 1:51 am
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: MXS Twitter

Post by ShackAttack12 »

squirrelboy86 wrote:
Phathry25 wrote:douchemobile
Explain how a performance car is a "douchemobile".Is it the fact that it is more expensive then some piece of shit and that if anybody can afford more than you can because they are more successful makes them a douche?
Because when Phat is jealous, you are a douche.
ShackAttack12
| 2010 Supercross Champ | 2011 Supercross Champ | 2019 Supercross Champ |
Phathry25
Posts: 7481
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:09 am
Team: No Frills Racing
Location: WI
Contact:

Re: MXS Twitter

Post by Phathry25 »

Lol. It's more like I like to give people crap. You could have posted a picture of my truck, when I paraphrased your post I was going to call it a douchemobile no matter what. It's not like you don't know how I work by now. Lol.
Phathry25
Posts: 7481
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:09 am
Team: No Frills Racing
Location: WI
Contact:

Re: MXS Twitter

Post by Phathry25 »

Hit submit too soon. When I saw your original post I was going to comment to do it, but you'd have to post pics of all the fine ass pussy you pull in it. But then read a page and a half of arguing about what a better performance automobile is and got side tracked.
Prada
Posts: 1099
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 3:35 pm

Re: MXS Twitter

Post by Prada »

No one cares
rideblue56
Posts: 3261
Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 6:03 pm
Team: FSK
Location: Virginia, USA

Re: MXS Twitter

Post by rideblue56 »

I care.
tyskorn
Posts: 6491
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:52 pm
Team: Adept MX Graphics
Location: Utah, USA

Re: MXS Twitter

Post by tyskorn »

Shut up, Stanley.
Post Reply