MXS Twitter
Re: MXS Twitter
TBH, I hate the gt500's. For the price, it's not worth it. They're alright on the outside, but on the inside its bad. The interior is cheap plastic and cloth. If I were spending that much on a car, you'd think that you wouldn't have to spend extra for a decent interior.

-
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:16 pm
- Team: SD | Action Suzuki
Re: MXS Twitter
Can't expect much from ford, there is a reason they are so cheap for the power! Although I do like the 2013 gt500, I would not choose that if I had the money for one. Also I am not a fan of the challenger or charger, the price to performance ratio is not that great in my opinion. I would go for a corvette before a srt8 392 challenger, and I actually drove a 392. A badass car but for that much I would rather spend a bit more for a used Cadillac CTS-V (supercharged 556hp760Liam wrote:TBH, I hate the gt500's. For the price, it's not worth it. They're alright on the outside, but on the inside its bad. The interior is cheap plastic and cloth. If I were spending that much on a car, you'd think that you wouldn't have to spend extra for a decent interior.


Click for go fast.Roy Mitchell wrote:I got cockblocked by the refrigerator
-
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 4:52 pm
- Team: wat
Re: MXS Twitter
Reread my post. I am not talking about the 392 I am talking about the 6.2 that is coming out for 2015.squirrelboy86 wrote:Can't expect much from ford, there is a reason they are so cheap for the power! Although I do like the 2013 gt500, I would not choose that if I had the money for one. Also I am not a fan of the challenger or charger, the price to performance ratio is not that great in my opinion. I would go for a corvette before a srt8 392 challenger, and I actually drove a 392. A badass car but for that much I would rather spend a bit more for a used Cadillac CTS-V (supercharged 556hp760Liam wrote:TBH, I hate the gt500's. For the price, it's not worth it. They're alright on the outside, but on the inside its bad. The interior is cheap plastic and cloth. If I were spending that much on a car, you'd think that you wouldn't have to spend extra for a decent interior.), unless I did not need to seat 5.Then I would go for a supercharged c6 vette
. Also most of the cars we are talking about are probably more expensive than that Caymen because that looks like it is a used one which could go for maybe 35-45k.
As for the GT500 comment, the 2012 and prior models were great to make cheap power with however the 2013 with the new motor and higher boost is not as cheap to modify.
-
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:16 pm
- Team: SD | Action Suzuki
Re: MXS Twitter
I did read it I was just talking about the ones that are out right now. Also, I have not seen anywhere them confirming a hp number or the transmission, the current 8 speed transmission they have is only capable of holding 516 ft-lbs. Do you have a link to your source for all this?
Click for go fast.Roy Mitchell wrote:I got cockblocked by the refrigerator
-
- Crushed Dissenter
- Posts: 3245
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 8:33 pm
- Team: MotardMatt220
- Location: KTM57
Re: MXS Twitter
Have you got anything better to be discussing here?Phathry25 wrote:Isn't there a car talk thread?
jlv wrote: Motardmatt220 is a crock of shit
KTM57 wrote: August is 13 years old and thinks he's hot shit because he's a lot younger than everyone else
Re: MXS Twitter
I always assumed this was a thread for random small bits of chatter. Not two page diatribes about why Fords suck. I'm fine with shack posting " I'm thinking about buying a douchemobile".
Long drawn out posts discussing the finer points of car and car parts design should reside I the car talk topic. Which is why I hunted there's a topic for it.
Long drawn out posts discussing the finer points of car and car parts design should reside I the car talk topic. Which is why I hunted there's a topic for it.
jlv wrote:Here's a picture of my nuts.
-
- Crushed Dissenter
- Posts: 3245
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 8:33 pm
- Team: MotardMatt220
- Location: KTM57
Re: MXS Twitter
Can't argue with that! Phats right again...
jlv wrote: Motardmatt220 is a crock of shit
KTM57 wrote: August is 13 years old and thinks he's hot shit because he's a lot younger than everyone else
-
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Wed Nov 25, 2009 10:16 pm
- Team: SD | Action Suzuki
Re: MXS Twitter
Explain how a performance car is a "douchemobile".Is it the fact that it is more expensive then some piece of shit and that if anybody can afford more than you can because they are more successful makes them a douche?Phathry25 wrote:douchemobile
Click for go fast.Roy Mitchell wrote:I got cockblocked by the refrigerator
-
- Posts: 3131
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 1:51 am
- Location: San Diego, CA
Re: MXS Twitter
Because when Phat is jealous, you are a douche.squirrelboy86 wrote:Explain how a performance car is a "douchemobile".Is it the fact that it is more expensive then some piece of shit and that if anybody can afford more than you can because they are more successful makes them a douche?Phathry25 wrote:douchemobile
ShackAttack12
| 2010 Supercross Champ | 2011 Supercross Champ | 2019 Supercross Champ |
Re: MXS Twitter
Lol. It's more like I like to give people crap. You could have posted a picture of my truck, when I paraphrased your post I was going to call it a douchemobile no matter what. It's not like you don't know how I work by now. Lol.
jlv wrote:Here's a picture of my nuts.
Re: MXS Twitter
Hit submit too soon. When I saw your original post I was going to comment to do it, but you'd have to post pics of all the fine ass pussy you pull in it. But then read a page and a half of arguing about what a better performance automobile is and got side tracked.
jlv wrote:Here's a picture of my nuts.
-
- Posts: 3261
- Joined: Thu May 21, 2009 6:03 pm
- Team: FSK
- Location: Virginia, USA
Re: MXS Twitter
Shut up, Stanley.