2015 MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Organize races and post results here
Post Reply
mxsrider96
Posts: 3603
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:15 am
Team: PoGo
Location: Indiana

Re: 2015 MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by mxsrider96 »

Dammit, Barrington... I thought that was you releasing the track, not spoilers
WAR CRY <3
Sun Burn
Top
barrington314
Posts: 6614
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 6:03 pm
Team: me
Location: Charleston, SC

Re: 2015 MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by barrington314 »

haha sorry. Wheels will when he gets home from work.
Top
bdownen323
Posts: 2949
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 11:00 pm

Re: 2015 MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by bdownen323 »

This idea just came to my mind, but it's directed towards Swheels about the "adding people by qualifying time" rule. I'm fully supportive of it, but I have something that I think should be added to make it fair.

-If an LCQ has less than the 22 riders required to make a full gate, riders will be added in this order:
  • Riders who WERE IN ATTENDANCE FOR UID GRABS but were not a part of the fast 40, in order of qualifying
  • Riders who were not in attendance at UID grabs but showed up late, in order of qualifying
Say the LCQ were to have only 20 riders, and guys like Deselle and Wheels were in the server for UID grabs but I show up after the first 450 semi. Should I be put in first? I don't think so. I missed UID grabs, and the other two guys were in for that, so they should have priority over me. Feel free to weigh in, but this is my opinion.

TL;DR - If an LCQ isn't full, add guys who were in for UID grab before guys who weren't so the guys who were there for UID grab don't get screwed.
Top
Atom6246
Posts: 4000
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:28 am

Re: 2015 MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by Atom6246 »

I like this idea^
Top
Ktmrdr11
Posts: 889
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 4:25 am
Team: I think Vurb
Location: Joplin, MO

Re: 2015 MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by Ktmrdr11 »

bdownen323 wrote:This idea just came to my mind, but it's directed towards Swheels about the "adding people by qualifying time" rule. I'm fully supportive of it, but I have something that I think should be added to make it fair.

-If an LCQ has less than the 22 riders required to make a full gate, riders will be added in this order:
  • Riders who WERE IN ATTENDANCE FOR UID GRABS but were not a part of the fast 40, in order of qualifying
  • Riders who were not in attendance at UID grabs but showed up late, in order of qualifying
Say the LCQ were to have only 20 riders, and guys like Deselle and Wheels were in the server for UID grabs but I show up after the first 450 semi. Should I be put in first? I don't think so. I missed UID grabs, and the other two guys were in for that, so they should have priority over me. Feel free to weigh in, but this is my opinion.

TL;DR - If an LCQ isn't full, add guys who were in for UID grab before guys who weren't so the guys who were there for UID grab don't get screwed.
You made some good points, but at the same time, I still feel top 5 or even 10 in points should get the first chance.
Top
TeamHavocRacing
Posts: 8401
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 5:52 am
Team: Havoc Racing
Contact:
Contact TeamHavocRacing

Re: 2015 MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by TeamHavocRacing »

That could lead to people exploiting that rule instead of being fair to those that could attend. "I'll jus keep rokin bowls till lcq and shoo in"
jlv wrote:If it weren't for Havoc I'd have been arguing with the 12 year olds by myself.
Top
MXTYSEN21
Posts: 880
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:50 am
Team: Volcom Racing
Location: UT, United States

Re: 2015 MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by MXTYSEN21 »

Well, good thing Hunter is going to be on time for uid grabs and heat races now. If that rule does get applied.
Image
you are a G jlv
Top
Bricks03
Posts: 248
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2012 2:40 pm
Team: Twist Moto Racing
Location: Denver, Co

Re: 2015 MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by Bricks03 »

bdownen323 wrote:This idea just came to my mind, but it's directed towards Swheels about the "adding people by qualifying time" rule. I'm fully supportive of it, but I have something that I think should be added to make it fair.

-If an LCQ has less than the 22 riders required to make a full gate, riders will be added in this order:
  • Riders who WERE IN ATTENDANCE FOR UID GRABS but were not a part of the fast 40, in order of qualifying
  • Riders who were not in attendance at UID grabs but showed up late, in order of qualifying
Say the LCQ were to have only 20 riders, and guys like Deselle and Wheels were in the server for UID grabs but I show up after the first 450 semi. Should I be put in first? I don't think so. I missed UID grabs, and the other two guys were in for that, so they should have priority over me. Feel free to weigh in, but this is my opinion.

TL;DR - If an LCQ isn't full, add guys who were in for UID grab before guys who weren't so the guys who were there for UID grab don't get screwed.

I agree
Image
Top
Norcal_51
Posts: 612
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 5:27 pm
Team: MotoStar Racing

Re: 2015 MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by Norcal_51 »

bdownen323 wrote:This idea just came to my mind, but it's directed towards Swheels about the "adding people by qualifying time" rule. I'm fully supportive of it, but I have something that I think should be added to make it fair.

-If an LCQ has less than the 22 riders required to make a full gate, riders will be added in this order:
  • Riders who WERE IN ATTENDANCE FOR UID GRABS but were not a part of the fast 40, in order of qualifying
  • Riders who were not in attendance at UID grabs but showed up late, in order of qualifying
Say the LCQ were to have only 20 riders, and guys like Deselle and Wheels were in the server for UID grabs but I show up after the first 450 semi. Should I be put in first? I don't think so. I missed UID grabs, and the other two guys were in for that, so they should have priority over me. Feel free to weigh in, but this is my opinion.

TL;DR - If an LCQ isn't full, add guys who were in for UID grab before guys who weren't so the guys who were there for UID grab don't get screwed.
IMO- I thought it would be a good idea to take the number of missing riders from the TOP40 (6 for example) and have a 4 lap moto to decide who got those spots. So the best or most consistent would go.
Image
Top
MOTOZ293
Posts: 3072
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 7:17 pm
Team: Hog Heaven Racing
Location: Ohio

Re: 2015 MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by MOTOZ293 »

Will A3 be out today?
Image
Top
ty casey
Posts: 395
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 7:29 pm
Team: OGP Racing

Re: 2015 MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by ty casey »

bdownen323 wrote:This idea just came to my mind, but it's directed towards Swheels about the "adding people by qualifying time" rule. I'm fully supportive of it, but I have something that I think should be added to make it fair.

-If an LCQ has less than the 22 riders required to make a full gate, riders will be added in this order:
  • Riders who WERE IN ATTENDANCE FOR UID GRABS but were not a part of the fast 40, in order of qualifying
  • Riders who were not in attendance at UID grabs but showed up late, in order of qualifying
Say the LCQ were to have only 20 riders, and guys like Deselle and Wheels were in the server for UID grabs but I show up after the first 450 semi. Should I be put in first? I don't think so. I missed UID grabs, and the other two guys were in for that, so they should have priority over me. Feel free to weigh in, but this is my opinion.

TL;DR - If an LCQ isn't full, add guys who were in for UID grab before guys who weren't so the guys who were there for UID grab don't get screwed.
Another good idea would be releasing the track on time. :wink:
https://www.youtube.com/user/TC132MX
^^Subcribe to my channel^^
Image
Top
AWood
Posts: 4657
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 4:05 am
Team: Who Knows...
Location: Test Tracks and In N Out

Re: 2015 MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by AWood »

ty casey wrote:
bdownen323 wrote:This idea just came to my mind, but it's directed towards Swheels about the "adding people by qualifying time" rule. I'm fully supportive of it, but I have something that I think should be added to make it fair.

-If an LCQ has less than the 22 riders required to make a full gate, riders will be added in this order:
  • Riders who WERE IN ATTENDANCE FOR UID GRABS but were not a part of the fast 40, in order of qualifying
  • Riders who were not in attendance at UID grabs but showed up late, in order of qualifying
Say the LCQ were to have only 20 riders, and guys like Deselle and Wheels were in the server for UID grabs but I show up after the first 450 semi. Should I be put in first? I don't think so. I missed UID grabs, and the other two guys were in for that, so they should have priority over me. Feel free to weigh in, but this is my opinion.

TL;DR - If an LCQ isn't full, add guys who were in for UID grab before guys who weren't so the guys who were there for UID grab don't get screwed.
Another good idea would be releasing the track on time. :wink:
monday afternoon when wheels gets off work is on time. :wink:
barrington314 wrote:awood is right
Leclair wrote:My name is barking
Leclair wrote:i fuck you
2014 rF GNC 22nd Overall - 2014 rF 450 SX 12th - 2014 rF 450 MX 11th Overall
2013 rF GNC 17th Overall - 2013 rF 450 SX 17th - 2013 rF 450 MX 8th - 2013 EMF French Cup Open World 6th
Top
ty casey
Posts: 395
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 7:29 pm
Team: OGP Racing

Re: 2015 MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by ty casey »

mmhmm :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink: :wink:
https://www.youtube.com/user/TC132MX
^^Subcribe to my channel^^
Image
Top
Atom6246
Posts: 4000
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:28 am

Re: 2015 MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by Atom6246 »

Ty why can't you just chill, they know when the track needs to be released so they don't need kids posting on the forum thinking they don't know.
Top
Mxs Racer 303
Posts: 582
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2014 7:43 am
Location: California

Re: 2015 MotoOption Supercross presented by Fly Racing

Post by Mxs Racer 303 »

Atom6246 wrote:Ty why can't you just chill, they know when the track needs to be released so they don't need kids posting on the forum thinking they don't know.
Tell him Atom tell him :D
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Racing”